Parameters
753.0B total / 40.0B active
MoE: total / active
Architecture
MoE with IndexShare sparse attention + MTP layer
Released
16.06.2026
License
MIT License
Input Modalities
Output Modalities
Context (native)
1,000,000 tokens
Context (extended)
1,000,000 tokens
About
GLM-5.2 (zai-org/GLM-5.2) is Z.ai's flagship model for long-horizon tasks - a large sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLM (~744-753B total parameters, ~40B active per token) that for the first time delivers long-horizon capability on a solid 1M-token context, released June 16, 2026 under the MIT License (no regional limits).
Its headline improvements over GLM-5.1: a stable 1M context that sustains long-horizon work; advanced coding with flexible thinking effort levels to balance performance and latency; and an improved architecture built around IndexShare - reusing the same sparse-attention indexer across every four attention layers (21 full + 57 shared indexers in the 78-layer stack, index top-k 2048 with 32 index heads of dim 128), which cuts per-token FLOPs by 2.9x at 1M context. The backbone (GlmMoeDsa) pairs DeepSeek-Sparse-Attention-style indexing with MLA-style compressed KV (kv-LoRA rank 512, 64 heads of dim 192), 3 dense + 75 sparse MoE layers, 256 routed experts + 1 shared with 8 routed per token (expert FFN 2048, sigmoid scoring, noaux-tc), hidden size 6144, vocab 155K, and an improved Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) layer for speculative decoding with up to 20% longer acceptance length.
GLM-5.2 leads open-weights models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v4.1, 11 points above GLM-5.1), with strong agentic/coding results (SWE-Bench Pro, NL2Repo, DeepSWE, HLE-with-tools at up to 400K context).
Training Data Trained as part of GLM-5 series with long-horizon task focus
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Score | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
Humanity's Last Exam
stem_reasoning
|
72.73%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
HLE (with tools)
stem_reasoning
|
79.24%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
CritPt (no tools)
stem_reasoning
|
64.04%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
AIME 26
stem_reasoning
|
100.00%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
HMMT Nov 25
stem_reasoning
|
89.34%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
HMMT Feb 26
stem_reasoning
|
93.26%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
IMOAnswerBench
stem_reasoning
|
97.16%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
GPQA Diamond
stem_reasoning
|
94.14%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
SWE-bench Pro
coding_agent
|
77.62%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
NL2Repo
coding_agent
|
59.38%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
DeepSWE 1.1
coding_agent
|
57.70%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
ProgramBench
coding_agent
|
88.10%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2)
coding_agent
|
88.50%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness)
coding_agent
|
95.14%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
SWE-Marathon
coding_agent
|
24.49%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
MCP-Atlas
general_agent
|
87.82%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
Tool Decathlon
general_agent
|
75.57%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
PostTrainBench
coding_agent
|
72.35%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
WildClawBench
coding_agent
|
73.09%
|
17.06.2026 |
|
Terminal Bench 2.1
coding_agent
|
89.36%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
DeepSWE
coding_agent
|
63.55%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
Toolathlon Verified
general_agent
|
64.07%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
Agents' Last Exam
general_agent
|
62.26%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
Automation-Bench
general_agent
|
4.77%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
DSBench-FullStack
coding_agent
|
61.69%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
DSBench-Hard
coding_agent
|
62.53%
|
31.07.2026 |
|
GDPVal-AA v2
general_agent
|
82.14%
|
27.08.2026 |
|
Terminal-Bench 3.0
coding_agent
|
4.60
|
28.08.2026 |
|
Cybergym
general_agent
|
77.94%
|
28.08.2026 |
|
ExploitGym (2h)
cybersecurity
|
7.43%
|
28.08.2026 |
|
ExploitGym (6h)
cybersecurity
|
4.87%
|
28.08.2026 |
|
ExploitBench
cybersecurity
|
24.40
|
28.08.2026 |
|
FrontierSWE
coding_agent
|
76.69%
|
17.06.2026 |
Flexible Thinking Effort Levels
Flexible Thinking Effort Levels
GLM-5.2 introduces effort level control, enabling users to explicitly balance model capability against task execution speed and computational cost.
Effort Levels
The model supports multiple thinking effort levels (e.g., low, medium, max) that control how much reasoning the model performs before generating a response.
Performance vs. Cost Trade-off
As shown in the GLM-5.2 blog, the model delivers substantially stronger agentic coding performance than GLM-5.1 at comparable token budgets. Its capability is roughly positioned between Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 under similar token consumption.
The Max effort level allows users to allocate additional computation when higher performance is required for challenging tasks, further extending the model's coding capability.
Evaluation Usage
- ProgramBench: Uses
reasoning_effort=maxwith 400K context - FrontierSWE: Uses
max effort levelwith 1M context - PostTrainBench: Uses
max effort levelwith 1M context - SWE-Marathon: Uses
max effort levelwith 1M context
MIT Open Source License
MIT Open Source License
GLM-5.2 is released under the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses available.
Key Terms
- Commercial use: Allowed (the model is marked as
commercial_use_allowed: Truein the DB) - Open source: Fully open source (
is_open_source: True) - No regional limits: The license explicitly states "no regional limits, technical access without borders"
- Modification and redistribution: Permitted under MIT terms
Significance
The "Pure Open" positioning is a key differentiator for GLM-5.2. Unlike many frontier models that restrict usage by region or impose commercial limitations, GLM-5.2 provides unrestricted access under MIT, making it one of the most openly available frontier-class models.
Model Tree and Ecosystem
Model Tree and Ecosystem
Model Tree for zai-org/GLM-5.2
| Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Adapters | 1 model |
| Finetunes | 24 models |
| Quantizations | 142 models |
Community Resources
- HuggingFace Collection: GLM-5.2 Collection — 2 items, updated Jun 16
- Blog Post: GLM-5.2: Built for Long-Horizon Tasks — Published Jun 17
- GitHub: zai-org/GLM-5
- API Platform: Z.ai API
- Chat Demo: chat.z.ai
Community
Notable Quantizations
- unsloth/GLM-5.2-GGUF — GGUF format
- QuantTrio/GLM-5.2-Int4-Int8Mix — INT4/INT8 mixed quantization
- zai-org/GLM-5.2-FP8 — FP8 quantization (also on Dell Enterprise Hub)
Statistics
- Downloads (last month): 2,576,335
- Likes: 5.04K
- Followers: 19K
BibTeX Citation
BibTeX Citation
If you find GLM-5.2 useful in your research, please cite the technical report:
@misc{glm5team2026glm5vibecodingagentic,
title={GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering},
author={GLM-5-Team and Aohan Zeng and Xin Lv and Zhenyu Hou and Zhengxiao Du and Qinkai Zheng and Bin Chen and Da Yin and Chendi Ge and Chenghua Huang and Chengxing Xie and Chenzheng Zhu and Congfeng Yin and Cunxiang Wang and Gengzheng Pan and Hao Zeng and Haoke Zhang and Haoran Wang and Huilong Chen and Jiajie Zhang and Jian Jiao and Jiaqi Guo and Jingsen Wang and Jingzhao Du and Jinzhu Wu and Kedong Wang and Lei Li and Lin Fan and Lucen Zhong and Mingdao Liu and Mingming Zhao and Pengfan Du and Qian Dong and Rui Lu and Shuang-Li and Shulin Cao and Song Liu and Ting Jiang and Xiaodong Chen and Xiaohan Zhang and Xuancheng Huang and Xuezhen Dong and Yabo Xu and Yao Wei and Yifan An and Yilin Niu and Yitong Zhu and Yuanhao Wen and Yukuo Cen and Yushi Bai and Zhongpei Qiao and Zihan Wang and Zikang Wang and Zilin Zhu and Ziqiang Liu and Zixuan Li and Bojie Wang and Bosi Wen and Can Huang and Changpeng Cai and Chao Yu and Chen Li and Chengwei Hu and Chenhui Zhang and Dan Zhang and Daoyan Lin and Dayong Yang and Di Wang and Ding Ai and Erle Zhu and Fangzhou Yi and Feiyu Chen and Guohong Wen and Hailong Sun and Haisha Zhao and Haiyi Hu and Hanchen Zhang and Hanrui Liu and Hanyu Zhang and Hao Peng and Hao Tai and Haobo Zhang and He Liu and Hongwei Wang and Hongxi Yan and Hongyu Ge and Huan Liu and Huanpeng Chu and Jia'ni Zhao and Jiachen Wang and Jiajing Zhao and Jiamin Ren and Jiapeng Wang and Jiaxin Zhang and Jiayi Gui and Jiayue Zhao and Jijie Li and Jing An and Jing Li and Jingwei Yuan and Jinhua Du and Jinxin Liu and Junkai Zhi and Junwen Duan and Kaiyue Zhou and Kangjian Wei and Ke Wang and Keyun Luo and Laiqiang Zhang and Leigang Sha and Liang Xu and Lindong Wu and Lintao Ding and Lu Chen and Minghao Li and Nianyi Lin and Pan Ta and Qiang Zou and Rongjun Song and Ruiqi Yang and Shangqing Tu and Shangtong Yang and Shaoxiang Wu and Shengyan Zhang and Shijie Li and Shuang Li and Shuyi Fan and Wei Qin and Wei Tian and Weining Zhang and Wenbo Yu and Wenjie Liang and Xiang Kuang and Xiangmeng Cheng and Xiangyang Li and Xiaoquan Yan and Xiaowei Hu and Xiaoying Ling and Xing Fan and Xingye Xia and Xinyuan Zhang and Xinze Zhang and Xirui Pan and Xu Zou and Xunkai Zhang and Yadi Liu and Yandong Wu and Yanfu Li and Yidong Wang and Yifan Zhu and Yijun Tan and Yilin Zhou and Yiming Pan and Ying Zhang and Yinpei Su and Yipeng Geng and Yong Yan and Yonglin Tan and Yuean Bi and Yuhan Shen and Yuhao Yang and Yujiang Li and Yunan Liu and Yunqing Wang and Yuntao Li and Yurong Wu and Yutao Zhang and Yuxi Duan and Yuxuan Zhang and Zezhen Liu and Zhengtao Jiang and Zhenhe Yan and Zheyu Zhang and Zhixiang Wei and Zhuo Chen and Zhuoer Feng and Zijun Yao and Ziwei Chai and Ziyuan Wang and Zuzhou Zhang and Bin Xu and Minlie Huang and Hongning Wang and Juanzi Li and Yuxiao Dong and Jie Tang},
year={2026},
eprint={2602.15763},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15763}
}
Related Papers
- GLM-5 Technical Report: arXiv:2602.15763 — "GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering"
- IndexShare Paper: arXiv:2603.12201 — "IndexCache: Accelerating Sparse Attention via Cross-Layer Index Reuse"
Evaluation Methodology
Evaluation Methodology
Reasoning Benchmarks
- HLE & other reasoning tasks: Sampling parameters:
temperature=1.0,top_p=0.95. Maximum generation length: 163,840 tokens. Text-only subset reported by default; results marked with * are from the full set. Judge model: GPT-5.5 (medium). For HLE-with-tools: max context length 300,000 tokens, no context management strategy. - AIME, HMMT, IMOAnswerBench: System prompt:
Your response should be in the following format: Explanation: {your explanation} Exact Answer: {your succinct, final answer} Confidence: {your confidence score between 0% and 100%}. Judge: GPT-5.5 (medium).
Coding Benchmarks
- SWE-Bench Pro: Run with OpenHands using a tailored instruction prompt. Settings:
temperature=1,top_p=1,max_new_tokens=32k, 400K context window. - NL2Repo:
temperature=1.0,top_p=1.0,max_new_tokens=48k, 400K context. Rule-based and LLM-based judgement to prevent malicious behaviors. - DeepSWE: Official pier evaluation framework, mini-swe-agent harness.
temperature=1.0,top_p=1.0,timeout=2h, 400K context. Isolated container: 2 CPUs, 8 GB RAM, no internet. - ProgramBench: 200 instances, Claude-Code 2.1.156.
temperature=1.0,top_p=1.0,max_tokens=64000,max_turns=2000,sample_timeout=6h,reasoning_effort=max, 400K context. Sandbox: 4 CPUs, 8 GB RAM, internet disabled. - Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus 2): Terminus-2 framework,
parser=json,timeout=4h,temperature=1.0,top_p=1.0,max_new_tokens=48k,max_episodes=500, 256K context. Resources: 4 CPUs, 8 GB RAM. - Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code): Claude Code 2.1.167,
temperature=1.0,top_p=0.95,max_new_tokens=131072(overridden to 128k via proxy). No wall-clock time limits. Scores averaged over 5 runs. - FrontierSWE: Conducted by Proximal. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens. Dominance score as of 2026/06/16.
- PostTrainBench: Conducted by PostTrainBench. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens.
- SWE-Marathon: Conducted by Abundant AI. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens.
Agentic Benchmarks
- MCP-Atlas: Think mode, 500-task public subset, 10-minute timeout per task. Judge: Gemini-3.0-Pro.
- Tool-Decathlon: Official evaluation service,
max_token=128K.
Supported Inference Frameworks
Supported Inference Frameworks
GLM-5.2 supports deployment with the following inference frameworks:
GPU Deployment
| Framework | Minimum Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| SGLang | v0.5.13.post1+ | cookbook |
| vLLM | v0.23.0+ | recipes |
| Transformers | v0.5.12+ | transformers docs |
| KTransformers | v0.5.12+ | tutorial |
| Unsloth | v0.1.47-beta+ | guide |
Ascend NPU Deployment
For deployment on the Ascend NPU platform, the following inference frameworks are supported:
- vLLM-Ascend
- xLLM
- SGLang
Reference: Ascend deployment guide
GLM-5.2 Full Benchmark Results
GLM-5.2 Full Benchmark Results
All scores are for GLM-5.2. Comparative models shown for context.
Reasoning Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.7-Max | MiniMax M3 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Claude Opus 4.8 | GPT-5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLE | 40.5 | 31 | 41.4 | 37 | 37.7 | 49.8* | 41.4* | 45 |
| HLE (w/ Tools) | 54.7 | 52.3 | 53.5 | - | 48.2 | 57.9* | 52.2* | 51.4* |
| CritPt | 20.9 | 4.6 | 13.4 | 3.7 | 12.9 | 20.9 | 27.1 | 17.7 |
| AIME 2026 | 99.2 | 95.3 | 97 | - | 94.6 | 95.7 | 98.3 | 98.2 |
| HMMT Nov. 2025 | 94.4 | 94 | 95 | 84.4 | 94.4 | 96.5 | 96.5 | 94.8 |
| HMMT Feb. 2026 | 92.5 | 82.6 | 97.1 | 84.4 | 95.2 | 96.7 | 96.7 | 87.3 |
| IMOAnswerBench | 91.0 | 83.8 | 90 | - | 89.8 | 83.5 | - | 81 |
| GPQA-Diamond | 91.2 | 86.2 | 90 | 93 | 90.1 | 93.6 | 93.6 | 94.3 |
Coding Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.7-Max | MiniMax M3 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Claude Opus 4.8 | GPT-5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro | 62.1 | 58.4 | 60.6 | 59 | 55.4 | 69.2 | 58.6 | 54.2 |
| NL2Repo | 48.9 | 42.7 | 47.2 | 42.1 | 35.5 | 69.7 | 50.7 | 33.4 |
| DeepSWE | 46.2 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 58 | 70 | 10 |
| ProgramBench | 63.7 | 50.9 | - | - | 47.8 | 71.9 | 70.8 | 39.5 |
| Terminal Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) | 81.0 | 63.5 | 75 | 65 | 64 | 85 | 84 | 74 |
| Terminal Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness) | 82.7 | 69 | - | - | - | 78.9 | 83.4 | 70.7 |
| FrontierSWE (Dominance) | 74.4 | 30.5 | - | - | 29.0 | 75.1 | 72.6 | 39.6 |
| PostTrainBench | 34.3 | 20.1 | - | - | - | 37.2 | 28.4 | 21.6 |
| SWE-Marathon | 13.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 26.0 | 12.0 | 4.0 |
Agentic Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.7-Max | MiniMax M3 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Claude Opus 4.8 | GPT-5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCP-Atlas (Public Set) | 76.8 | 71.8 | 76.4 | 74.2 | 73.6 | 77.8 | 75.3 | 69.2 |
| Tool-Decathlon | 48.2 | 40.7 | - | - | 52.8 | 59.9 | 55.6 | 48.8 |
Key Takeaways
- GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms GLM-5.1 across all benchmark categories
- On Terminal Bench 2.1, GLM-5.2 (81.0) is within a few points of Claude Opus 4.8 (85.0)
- On DeepSWE, GLM-5.2 (46.2) is a massive improvement over GLM-5.1 (18.0)
- On FrontierSWE (Dominance), GLM-5.2 (74.4) is competitive with Claude Opus 4.8 (75.1)
- Scores marked with * are from the full HLE set, not text-only subset
1M Token Native Context
Solid 1M-Token Context
GLM-5.2 delivers, for the first time in the GLM series, a solid 1M-token context that stably sustains long-horizon work.
Context Window
- Native context length: 1,000,000 tokens (1M)
- Extended context length: 1,000,000 tokens (1M) — no extension beyond native
- Stability: The context is described as "solid" — it stably sustains long-horizon tasks without degradation, a substantial improvement over GLM-5.1.
Significance
This 1M context is a core differentiator for GLM-5.2, enabling it to handle long-horizon agentic coding tasks, large document processing, and extended multi-turn reasoning that were not feasible with GLM-5.1's context window.
MTP Layer for Speculative Decoding
MTP Layer for Speculative Decoding
GLM-5.2 improves the Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) layer used for speculative decoding, achieving two key objectives:
Improvements over GLM-5.1
- Increased acceptance length: The MTP layer improvements increase the speculative decoding acceptance length by up to 20% compared to GLM-5.1.
- Training-inference consistency: GLM-5.2 eliminates the training-inference discrepancy present in GLM-5.1's MTP layer. In the two-step MTP inference, the first step is consistent with training (all hidden states from the target model). The second step resolves the mismatch where some hidden states come from the MTP layer rather than the target model.
How It Works
In a two-step MTP layer:
- Step 1: All hidden states come from the target model — inference is consistent with training.
- Step 2: Some hidden states come from the target model and some from the MTP layer, which previously caused a training-inference discrepancy in GLM-5.1.
IndexShare Sparse Attention
IndexShare Sparse Attention
GLM-5.2 introduces IndexShare, a novel architectural innovation for sparse attention that reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers.
Key Properties
- Cross-layer index reuse: The same indexer is shared across groups of four consecutive sparse attention layers, eliminating redundant indexer computations.
- FLOP reduction: Reduces per-token FLOPs by 2.9× at a 1M context length compared to non-shared indexing.
- Architecture tag:
glm_moe_dsa(GLM Mixture-of-Experts with Dynamic Sparse Attention)
Related Papers
- IndexCache: Accelerating Sparse Attention via Cross-Layer Index Reuse — Published March 2026
Model Configuration
- Total Parameters: 753B
- Architecture Type: MoE with IndexShare sparse attention + MTP layer
- Tensor Types: BF16, F32
GLM-5.2 Introduction and Key Capabilities
GLM-5.2 Introduction and Key Capabilities
GLM-5.2 is the latest flagship model from Zhipu AI (zai-org), designed for long-horizon tasks. It marks a substantial leap in long-horizon task capability over its predecessor GLM-5.1 and, for the first time, delivers that capability on a solid 1M-token context.
Key Capabilities
- Solid 1M Context — A solid 1M-token context that stably sustains long-horizon work.
- Advanced Coding with Flexible Effort — Stronger coding capabilities with multiple thinking effort levels to balance performance and latency.
- Improved Architecture — IndexShare reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers, reducing per-token FLOPs by 2.9× at a 1M context length. The MTP layer for speculative decoding is improved, increasing acceptance length by up to 20%.
- Pure Open — An MIT open-source license with no regional limits and technical access without borders.
Model Identity
- Provider: Zhipu AI (zai-org)
- Model Family: GLM
- Release Date: 2026-06-16
- Parameters: 753B
- Tensor Type: BF16, F32
- Languages: English, Chinese
- Tags: Text Generation, Transformers, Safetensors, glm_moe_dsa, conversational, Eval Results
Architecture
- Attention
- Sparse Attention
- MoE
- 256 experts · top-8 per token
- Layers
- 78
- Hidden size
- 6144
- Context
- 1M tokens
- Parameters
- 753000M
- Active params
- 40000M
Source: Hugging Face config.json · GlmMoeDsaForCausalLM · model repo
Training Pipeline
-
1
pretraining
Pre-training (~28.5T tokens, GLM-5 series)
GLM-5 series pre-training corpus (28.5T tokens, per zai-org/GLM-5 GitHub).
-
2
rl
Post-training for long-horizon tasks
Post-trained as part of the GLM-5 series with long-horizon task focus (DB training_data_info); flexible thinking-effort levels.
Training & Evaluation Datasets
| Name | Role | Size | Modalities | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5 series pre-training corpus (~28.5T tokens) | pretraining | — | — |
Linked Resources
GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15763
GLM-5 GitHub Repository
https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-5
GLM-5.2: Built for Long-Horizon Tasks
https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.2
Z.ai API Platform - GLM-5.2
https://docs.z.ai/guides/llm/glm-5.2
Chat Z.ai - GLM-5.2 Demo
https://chat.z.ai/
GLM Discord Community
https://discord.gg/QR7SARHRxK
IndexCache: Accelerating Sparse Attention via Cross-Layer Index Reuse
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12201
GLM-5.2 Collection on HuggingFace
https://huggingface.co/collections/zai-org/glm-52
GLM-5.2 Blog on HuggingFace
https://huggingface.co/blog/zai-org/glm-52-blog
GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering (BibTeX Citation)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15763
Trend Analysis
24h Change
+0.4%
7d Change
+5.0%
Current
20,001
downloads
-6.5%
downloads_all_time
+0.9%
likes
+0.0%
downloads
+0.2%
Usage & Social Metrics
| Source | Metric | Value | Period | Recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ollama | downloads | 337,700 pulls | daily | 01.09.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads_all_time | 3,851,617 | daily | 01.09.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 20,001 | daily | 01.09.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,065 | daily | 01.09.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 1,452,214 | daily | 01.09.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 337,100 pulls | daily | 31.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads_all_time | 3,818,948 | daily | 31.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,927 | daily | 31.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,064 | daily | 31.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 1,552,546 | daily | 31.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 336,300 pulls | daily | 30.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads_all_time | 3,798,487 | daily | 30.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,819 | daily | 30.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,062 | daily | 30.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 1,861,163 | daily | 30.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 335,600 pulls | daily | 29.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,739 | daily | 29.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,060 | daily | 29.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 1,832,948 | daily | 29.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 334,300 pulls | daily | 28.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,618 | daily | 28.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,058 | daily | 28.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 1,903,277 | daily | 28.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 333,100 pulls | daily | 27.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,458 | daily | 27.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,055 | daily | 27.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,037,821 | daily | 27.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 331,700 pulls | daily | 26.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,254 | daily | 26.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,053 | daily | 26.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,184,066 | daily | 26.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 330,200 pulls | daily | 25.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,044 | daily | 25.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,049 | daily | 25.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,420,481 | daily | 25.08.2026 |
| ollama | downloads | 329,000 pulls | daily | 24.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 19,009 | daily | 24.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,043 | daily | 24.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,576,335 | daily | 24.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 18,959 | daily | 23.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,037 | daily | 23.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,685,029 | daily | 23.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 18,923 | daily | 22.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,024 | daily | 22.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,715,564 | daily | 22.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 18,888 | daily | 21.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,018 | daily | 21.08.2026 |
| huggingface | downloads | 2,768,721 | daily | 21.08.2026 |
| huggingface | followers | 18,846 | daily | 20.08.2026 |
| huggingface | likes | 5,014 | daily | 20.08.2026 |