Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Large 4 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Hydrogen-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview

New Comparison

Scores are fetched live from the current database on every visit — nothing is cached.

Winner

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 scores higher overall across category strength profiles (74 vs 57 for DeepSeek V4 Pro); only 0 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Claude Opus 5 74.2 DeepSeek V4 Pro 57.3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 57.1 Claude Sonnet 4.6 46.2 Ripple-65B Preview 42.2 Mistral Large 4 37.4 Hydrogen-1.0 0 SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 0

Only 0 of 122 benchmarks are scored by every selected model — the verdict leans on category strength profiles and is indicative.

Benchmark Scores Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V4 Pro Claude Opus 5 Mistral Large 4 SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview Hydrogen-1.0 Ripple-65B Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Score: 15.0

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Score: 15.0

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Score: 15.0

Claude Opus 5

Score: 40.0

Mistral Large 4

1.0T params

SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview

10.0B params

Hydrogen-1.0

753.3B params

Ripple-65B Preview

65.0B params

Coverage matrix

8 models × 122 benchmarks — hover a benchmark name for its category

Full Coverage Matrix
Hides benchmarks where all selected models score identically.
Shading = score relative to the best score among the selected models: Low Mid High Missing (—) The totals row shows how many of the 122 benchmarks each model has scores for.
Benchmark Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview sensenova Hydrogen-1.0 deep-principle Ripple-65B Preview Ricursive Intelligence Gemini 3.1 Pro Google Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
SVG-Bench — — — — 59.2 64.1 61.7 —
Malicious Cyber Request Refusal 96.6 — — — — — — —
GPQA Diamond — — — 85.2 94.3 — 92.8 93.7
FrontierCode 2.0 19.7 — — — — — — —
ArXivMath — — — — — — 62.1 71.5
LiveCodeBench v6 — — — — 91.7 — — —
Hy-LifeSearch (Internal) — — — — — — 46.9 56.1
Automation-Bench — — — — — — 30.4 48.7
SWE-bench Pro — — — 61.42 54.2 — 55.4 79.2
BioMysteryBench — — — — — — 61.6 72.1
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index 48 — — — — — — —
AA-LCR — — — 75 — — — —
MathVision — — — — 89.8 — — —
AIME 26 — — — 95 98.2 — — —
LiveSQLBench — — — — 39.8 — — —
AgentWorldBench Terminal — — — — 52.47 56.98 — —
Agents' Last Exam — — — — — — 21.9 25.1
Toolathlon Verified — — — — 48.8 — 74.1 76.5
Hy-Backend 2.0 (Internal) — — — — — — 33.8 40.3
OJBench — — — — 70.7 — — —
Hy-SWE Max Verified (Internal) — — — — — — 65.7 70.1
AgentWorldBench Overall — — — — 54.57 56.04 — —
Hy-BrowseComp-Pro2 (Internal) — — — — — — 46.5 61.3
AutomationBench (Public) — — — 36.4 — — — —
GDPVal — — — — 57.8 75.7 70.3 —
OfficeQA Pro — — — — 18.1 — 65.4 66.9
Apex-Shortlist (no tools) — — — — 89.1 — — —
DeepSearch QA — — — — 81.9 — — —
StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive) — — — 97.5 — — — —
SWE Atlas - TW — — — — 29.8 31.8 45.6 68.7
CL-bench — — — — 21.1 — — —
LOCA-Bench (256k) — — — — — — — 53.7
KernelBench Hard — — — — 18.6 — — —
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard — — — 79.1 — — — —
AgentWorldBench Web — — — — 52.83 50.78 — —
SWE Atlas - QnA — — — — 13.5 31.2 53.4 57.5
IMO 2025 — — — — 42.4 — — —
NL2Repo — — — — 33.4 — 61.5 75.3
MMMU-Pro — — — — 80.5 74.5 — —
PostTrainBench — — — — 15.2 — 24.5 35
BabyVision — — — — 51.6 — — 94.1
Claw-Eval Avg — — — — 57.8 68.3 58.4 —
VideoMMMU — — — — 87.9 — — —
HMMT Nov 25 — — — — 94.8 — — —
Apex-Agents — — — — 33.4 26.2 32.4 41.8
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 26 — — — — — — —
WorkSpaceBench — — — — — — 65.4 75
MMLU-Pro — — — 84.2 91 — — —
CodeForces — — — — 3052 — — —
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 4.3 — — — — — — —
BankerToolBench — — — — 67 — 73.1 81.9
E-Bench-Code (Internal) — — — — — — 64.3 82.7
OSWorld-Verified — — — — 76.2 72.5 — —
AgentWorldBench Search — — — — 30.21 28.79 — —
HLE (with tools) — — — — 51.4 — 60 60.9
CharXiv (RQ) — — — — 80.2 — — 83.7
FrontierSWE — — — — 39.6 — — —
GDP.pdf — — — — — — — 21.6
AIME 2024 — — — 97.1 — — — —
CritPt (no tools) — — — — 17.7 — 18 29.1
BrowseComp 84.5 — — — 85.9 74.7 83.4 —
NL2Repo-Bench — — — — 21.6 — 35.5 75.3
DRACO — — — — — 75.8 77.3 88.6
MCPMark — — — — 55.9 — — —
SWE-bench Multilingual — — — — 76.9 — 77.3 89.5
MMLU — — — 89.6 — — — —
PaperBench — — — — 46.7 — — —
YC-Bench — — — — 1100000 100000 500000 —
Hy-FinAgentBench (Internal) — — — — — — 78.5 82
IFBench — — — 79.2 — — — —
SWE-bench Verified — — — 76.5 80.6 79.6 80.6 —
IMOAnswerBench — — — — 81 — — —
Humanity's Last Exam — — — — 45 — 42.7 54.9
Terminal-Bench 2.0 — — — — 68.5 — — —
Artificial Analysis Cyber Index 51 — — — — — — —
SpreadSheetBench-v1 — — — — 56.1 — 84.9 —
SUPERChem — — — — — — 62 76.7
VIBE-V2 — — — — 28 42.8 45 —
HorizonMath (pass@4) — — — — — — 4.42 5.3
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) — — — 80.5 74 — 87.9 86.7
DeepSWE — — — — — — 62.7 68.8
BrokenArXiv — — — — — — 43.1 77.7
OmniDocBench 1.5 — — — — 88.1 86.9 — —
B3 Agent Security Benchmark (Attack Resistance) 97.1 — — — — — — —
HMMT Feb 26 — — — 90.5 87.3 — — —
AgentWorldBench OS — — — — 66.92 63.17 — —
AgentWorldBench MCP — — — — 59.07 70 — —
Hy-FinmodelBench v2 (Internal) — — — — — — 51.3 66
MathArena Apex 2025 — — — — — — 66.3 91.4
Terminal Bench 2.1 — — — 80.5 70.3 — 59.6 —
AIME 2025 — — — 98.3 — — — —
AgentWorldBench SWE — — — — 59.07 64.52 — —
JobBench — — — — — — 54.1 68
$OneMillion-Bench — — — — — — 62 68.1
SciCode (subtask) — — — — 58.9 — — —
USAMO 2026 — — — — 74.4 — — —
Tool Decathlon — — — — 48.8 — — —
OSWorld 2.0 (Binary) — — — — — — — 70.6
WideSearch — — — — — — 81.8 84
VideoMME (w sub.) — — — — 87.9 — — —
SkillsBench Avg5 — — — — — — 65 63.7
TauBench V3 Banking — — — 31.27 — — — —
Claw-Eval Pass^3 — — — — 57.8 — — —
E-Bench (Internal) — — — — — — 61.3 77.8
ProgramBench — — — — 39.5 — 15.5 39.5
MCP-Atlas — — — 71.67 69.2 61.3 73.6 85.7
SWE-Marathon — — — — 4 — 19 50
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness) — — — — 70.7 — — —
Cybergym — — — — — — 83.3 —
Terminal-Bench 4.0 41 — — — — — — 51.8
SWE Atlas - RF — — — — — — 48.6 60
V-Star — — — — 96.9 — — —
AgentWorldBench Android — — — — 61.4 58.03 — —
DeepSWE 1.1 — — — 44.3 10 — — 74
FORTRESS Benign — — — 95.5 — — — —
Hy-CompanyBench V2 (Internal) — — — — — — 64.4 72.7
Harbor-Index — — — — — — 36.9 56.9
SWE-efficiency — — — — 19.7 — — —
SWE Refactor Bench — — — — — — — 31
SciCode — — — 39.4 — — — —
FinWorkBench (Finch) 73.3 — — — — — — —
GDPVal-AA v2 — — — — 1314 — 1580 1831
Covered 10/122 0/122 0/122 21/122 71/122 23/122 56/122 54/122

Scorecard

Overall 0–100 score — category strengths (50%), shared-benchmark wins (30%), coverage (20%)

Model Overall score Shared benchmark wins Coverage Strongest at Weakest at
Claude Opus 5 Winner 74.2 — 54 of 122 (44.0%) General Capabilities Document Understanding
DeepSeek V4 Pro 57.3 — 56 of 122 (46.0%) General Capabilities STEM & Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro 57.1 — 71 of 122 (58.0%) Knowledge Agentic Coding
Claude Sonnet 4.6 46.2 — 23 of 122 (19.0%) Document Understanding Agentic Coding
Ripple-65B Preview 42.2 — 21 of 122 (17.0%) Knowledge General Agents
Mistral Large 4 37.4 — 10 of 122 (8.0%) General Agents Agentic Coding
Hydrogen-1.0 0 — 0 of 122 (0.0%) — —
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 0 — 0 of 122 (0.0%) — —

Category strengths

Where each model stands, per benchmark category — score relative to the best model, adjusted for benchmark coverage. This also ranks models when they share few benchmarks.

Category Claude Opus 5 DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.6 Ripple-65B Preview Mistral Large 4 Hydrogen-1.0 SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
General Agents 38 benchmarks 79.8 59.2 60 59 45.7 55.6 — —
Agentic Coding 37 benchmarks 90.4 67.3 41.8 52.3 54.2 41.2 — —
STEM & Reasoning 23 benchmarks 92.4 55.4 66.7 — 61.5 — — —
Vision & Language 4 benchmarks 77.5 — 73.9 68.9 — — — —
Document Understanding 2 benchmarks 77.5 — 90.1 76.4 — — — —
Finance 2 benchmarks 100 66.3 — — — — — —
Knowledge 2 benchmarks — — 100 — 78.1 — — —
General Capabilities 1 benchmark 100 76.8 — — — — — —

Partial coverage benchmarks

Scored by at least one but not all selected models (122) — missing scores show as —

Benchmark Category Gemini 3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V4 Pro Claude Opus 5 Mistral Large 4 SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview Hydrogen-1.0 Ripple-65B Preview
SVG-Bench 3/8 models coding_agent 59.2 64.1 61.7 — — — — —
Malicious Cyber Request Refusal 1/8 models composite — — — — 96.6 — — —
GPQA Diamond 4/8 models stem_reasoning 94.3 — 92.8 93.7 — — — 85.2
FrontierCode 2.0 1/8 models coding_agent — — — — 19.7 — — —
ArXivMath 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 62.1 71.5 — — — —
LiveCodeBench v6 1/8 models stem_reasoning 91.7 — — — — — — —
Hy-LifeSearch (Internal) 2/8 models general_agent — — 46.9 56.1 — — — —
Automation-Bench 2/8 models general_agent — — 30.4 48.7 — — — —
SWE-bench Pro 4/8 models coding_agent 54.2 — 55.4 79.2 — — — 61.42
BioMysteryBench 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 61.6 72.1 — — — —
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index 1/8 models composite — — — — 48 — — —
AA-LCR 1/8 models long_context — — — — — — — 75
MathVision 1/8 models vision_language 89.8 — — — — — — —
AIME 26 2/8 models stem_reasoning 98.2 — — — — — — 95
LiveSQLBench 1/8 models coding_agent 39.8 — — — — — — —
AgentWorldBench Terminal 2/8 models general_agent 52.47 56.98 — — — — — —
Agents' Last Exam 2/8 models general_agent — — 21.9 25.1 — — — —
Toolathlon Verified 3/8 models general_agent 48.8 — 74.1 76.5 — — — —
Hy-Backend 2.0 (Internal) 2/8 models coding_agent — — 33.8 40.3 — — — —
OJBench 1/8 models stem_reasoning 70.7 — — — — — — —
Hy-SWE Max Verified (Internal) 2/8 models coding_agent — — 65.7 70.1 — — — —
AgentWorldBench Overall 2/8 models general_agent 54.57 56.04 — — — — — —
Hy-BrowseComp-Pro2 (Internal) 2/8 models general_agent — — 46.5 61.3 — — — —
AutomationBench (Public) 1/8 models general_agent — — — — — — — 36.4
GDPVal 3/8 models general_agent 57.8 75.7 70.3 — — — — —
OfficeQA Pro 3/8 models general_agent 18.1 — 65.4 66.9 — — — —
Apex-Shortlist (no tools) 1/8 models stem_reasoning 89.1 — — — — — — —
DeepSearch QA 1/8 models general_agent 81.9 — — — — — — —
StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive) 1/8 models safety — — — — — — — 97.5
SWE Atlas - TW 4/8 models coding_agent 29.8 31.8 45.6 68.7 — — — —
CL-bench 1/8 models coding_agent 21.1 — — — — — — —
LOCA-Bench (256k) 1/8 models long_context — — — 53.7 — — — —
KernelBench Hard 1/8 models coding_agent 18.6 — — — — — — —
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard 1/8 models coding_agent — — — — — — — 79.1
AgentWorldBench Web 2/8 models general_agent 52.83 50.78 — — — — — —
SWE Atlas - QnA 4/8 models coding_agent 13.5 31.2 53.4 57.5 — — — —
IMO 2025 1/8 models stem_reasoning 42.4 — — — — — — —
NL2Repo 3/8 models coding_agent 33.4 — 61.5 75.3 — — — —
MMMU-Pro 2/8 models vision_language 80.5 74.5 — — — — — —
PostTrainBench 3/8 models coding_agent 15.2 — 24.5 35 — — — —
BabyVision 2/8 models vision_language 51.6 — — 94.1 — — — —
Claw-Eval Avg 3/8 models coding_agent 57.8 68.3 58.4 — — — — —
VideoMMMU 1/8 models video_understanding 87.9 — — — — — — —
HMMT Nov 25 1/8 models stem_reasoning 94.8 — — — — — — —
Apex-Agents 4/8 models general_agent 33.4 26.2 32.4 41.8 — — — —
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 1/8 models composite — — — — 26 — — —
WorkSpaceBench 2/8 models general_agent — — 65.4 75 — — — —
MMLU-Pro 2/8 models knowledge 91 — — — — — — 84.2
CodeForces 1/8 models stem_reasoning 3052 — — — — — — —
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 1/8 models coding_agent — — — — 4.3 — — —
BankerToolBench 3/8 models general_agent 67 — 73.1 81.9 — — — —
E-Bench-Code (Internal) 2/8 models coding_agent — — 64.3 82.7 — — — —
OSWorld-Verified 2/8 models general_agent 76.2 72.5 — — — — — —
AgentWorldBench Search 2/8 models general_agent 30.21 28.79 — — — — — —
HLE (with tools) 3/8 models stem_reasoning 51.4 — 60 60.9 — — — —
CharXiv (RQ) 2/8 models document_understanding 80.2 — — 83.7 — — — —
FrontierSWE 1/8 models coding_agent 39.6 — — — — — — —
GDP.pdf 1/8 models long_context — — — 21.6 — — — —
AIME 2024 1/8 models stem_reasoning — — — — — — — 97.1
CritPt (no tools) 3/8 models stem_reasoning 17.7 — 18 29.1 — — — —
BrowseComp 4/8 models general_agent 85.9 74.7 83.4 — 84.5 — — —
NL2Repo-Bench 3/8 models coding_agent 21.6 — 35.5 75.3 — — — —
DRACO 3/8 models general_agent — 75.8 77.3 88.6 — — — —
MCPMark 1/8 models general_agent 55.9 — — — — — — —
SWE-bench Multilingual 3/8 models coding_agent 76.9 — 77.3 89.5 — — — —
MMLU 1/8 models knowledge — — — — — — — 89.6
PaperBench 1/8 models coding_agent 46.7 — — — — — — —
YC-Bench 3/8 models general_agent 1100000 100000 500000 — — — — —
Hy-FinAgentBench (Internal) 2/8 models domain_finance — — 78.5 82 — — — —
IFBench 1/8 models instruction_following — — — — — — — 79.2
SWE-bench Verified 4/8 models coding_agent 80.6 79.6 80.6 — — — — 76.5
IMOAnswerBench 1/8 models stem_reasoning 81 — — — — — — —
Humanity's Last Exam 3/8 models stem_reasoning 45 — 42.7 54.9 — — — —
Terminal-Bench 2.0 1/8 models coding_agent 68.5 — — — — — — —
Artificial Analysis Cyber Index 1/8 models composite — — — — 51 — — —
SpreadSheetBench-v1 2/8 models general_agent 56.1 — 84.9 — — — — —
SUPERChem 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 62 76.7 — — — —
VIBE-V2 3/8 models coding_agent 28 42.8 45 — — — — —
HorizonMath (pass@4) 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 4.42 5.3 — — — —
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) 4/8 models coding_agent 74 — 87.9 86.7 — — — 80.5
DeepSWE 2/8 models coding_agent — — 62.7 68.8 — — — —
BrokenArXiv 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 43.1 77.7 — — — —
OmniDocBench 1.5 2/8 models document_understanding 88.1 86.9 — — — — — —
B3 Agent Security Benchmark (Attack Resistance) 1/8 models general_agent — — — — 97.1 — — —
HMMT Feb 26 2/8 models stem_reasoning 87.3 — — — — — — 90.5
AgentWorldBench OS 2/8 models general_agent 66.92 63.17 — — — — — —
AgentWorldBench MCP 2/8 models general_agent 59.07 70 — — — — — —
Hy-FinmodelBench v2 (Internal) 2/8 models domain_finance — — 51.3 66 — — — —
MathArena Apex 2025 2/8 models stem_reasoning — — 66.3 91.4 — — — —
Terminal Bench 2.1 3/8 models coding_agent 70.3 — 59.6 — — — — 80.5
AIME 2025 1/8 models stem_reasoning — — — — — — — 98.3
AgentWorldBench SWE 2/8 models general_agent 59.07 64.52 — — — — — —
JobBench 2/8 models general_agent — — 54.1 68 — — — —
$OneMillion-Bench 2/8 models general_capabilities — — 62 68.1 — — — —
SciCode (subtask) 1/8 models stem_reasoning 58.9 — — — — — — —
USAMO 2026 1/8 models stem_reasoning 74.4 — — — — — — —
Tool Decathlon 1/8 models general_agent 48.8 — — — — — — —
OSWorld 2.0 (Binary) 1/8 models general_agent — — — 70.6 — — — —
WideSearch 2/8 models general_agent — — 81.8 84 — — — —
VideoMME (w sub.) 1/8 models video_understanding 87.9 — — — — — — —
SkillsBench Avg5 2/8 models coding_agent — — 65 63.7 — — — —
TauBench V3 Banking 1/8 models general_agent — — — — — — — 31.27
Claw-Eval Pass^3 1/8 models coding_agent 57.8 — — — — — — —
E-Bench (Internal) 2/8 models general_agent — — 61.3 77.8 — — — —
ProgramBench 3/8 models coding_agent 39.5 — 15.5 39.5 — — — —
MCP-Atlas 5/8 models general_agent 69.2 61.3 73.6 85.7 — — — 71.67
SWE-Marathon 3/8 models coding_agent 4 — 19 50 — — — —
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness) 1/8 models coding_agent 70.7 — — — — — — —
Cybergym 1/8 models general_agent — — 83.3 — — — — —
Terminal-Bench 4.0 2/8 models coding_agent — — — 51.8 41 — — —
SWE Atlas - RF 2/8 models coding_agent — — 48.6 60 — — — —
V-Star 1/8 models vision_language 96.9 — — — — — — —
AgentWorldBench Android 2/8 models general_agent 61.4 58.03 — — — — — —
DeepSWE 1.1 3/8 models coding_agent 10 — — 74 — — — 44.3
FORTRESS Benign 1/8 models safety — — — — — — — 95.5
Hy-CompanyBench V2 (Internal) 2/8 models general_agent — — 64.4 72.7 — — — —
Harbor-Index 2/8 models coding_agent — — 36.9 56.9 — — — —
SWE-efficiency 1/8 models coding_agent 19.7 — — — — — — —
SWE Refactor Bench 1/8 models coding_agent — — — 31 — — — —
SciCode 1/8 models — — — — — — — — 39.4
FinWorkBench (Finch) 1/8 models general_agent — — — — 73.3 — — —
GDPVal-AA v2 3/8 models general_agent 1314 — 1580 1831 — — — —

Comparison FAQ

Which model scores highest in this comparison?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher overall across category strength profiles (74 vs 57 for DeepSeek V4 Pro); only 0 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Which model is strongest at General Agents?

Claude Opus 5 leads the General Agents category (strength score 79.8/100 across 29 comparable benchmarks).

How reliable is this comparison verdict?

Only 0 of 122 benchmarks are scored by every selected model — the verdict leans on category strength profiles and is indicative.

What now?

You've seen 8 models side by side — keep the loop going.

Share this comparison

The URL is the comparison — copy or share it anywhere. No tracking, no cookies.

Not the right matchup?

Open the create form with these models pre-filled and untick the one you want to replace.

Swap a model