Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1

New Comparison

Scores are fetched live from the current database on every visit — nothing is cached.

Benchmark Scores Comparison

Kimi K3 Kolibri-1

Kimi K3

Score: 15.0

Kolibri-1

78.1B params

Coverage matrix

2 models × 55 benchmarks — hover a benchmark name for its category

Full Coverage Matrix
Hides benchmarks where all selected models score identically.
Shading = score relative to the best score among the selected models: Low Mid High Missing (—) The totals row shows how many of the 55 benchmarks each model has scores for.
Benchmark Kolibri-1 Aleph Alpha Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
OmniScience Accuracy 14.8 —
GPQA Diamond 84.3 —
IFBench (prompt loose) 78.1 —
SealQA (12 distractors, <24k) 61 —
LiveCodeBench v6 85.9 —
BFCL-V4 61.4 —
AA-LCR 68.3 —
AIME 26 96 —
FRAMES (<24k) 71.2 —
German Public Sector 75 —
OmniScience Non-Hallucination 44 —
Aerospace 58.9 —
Agentic Wiki QA (DE) 69.4 —
WMDP (Bio) — 89.1
AIME 2025 (DE) 87.5 —
Overall (EN) 75.5 —
MuSiQue (EN) 77.3 —
SealQA (no distractors, >24k) 100 —
HPCT — 59.6
HumanEval+ 92.7 —
MMLU-ProX 75.5 —
BrowseComp 29.4 —
BFCL v4 (web search) 62.5 —
RGB Closed-Book 51 —
Lab Bench (ProtocolQA) — 81.9
Industrial Drive Technology 60 —
AA-Omniscience Index (public set) -32.8 —
Humanity's Last Exam (DE) 15.9 —
SWE-bench Verified 66.4 —
Humanity's Last Exam 21.5 —
WMDP (Chem) — 84.2
BFCL v4 (non-live AST) 79.1 —
BFCL v4 (live) 78.9 —
BFCL v4 (memory) 62.8 —
AIME 2026 (DE) 90 —
Automotive Supplier 99 —
GPQA Diamond (DE) 81.3 —
SQuAD (Utility Accuracy) 83.4 —
Terminal Bench 2.1 27.7 —
AIME 2025 96.9 —
BFCL v4 (multi-turn) 47.5 —
RGB Fact-Check (Error Correction) 34 —
SQuAD (M/A Grounding Score) 23.4 —
LongBenchPro 64.5 —
FRAMES (>24k) 73 —
Semiconductors 80.4 —
Honeypot 80.8 —
TauBench V3 Banking 38.1 —
MBCT — 58.9
VCT — 48
RGB Negative (Abstention) 85.6 —
MMLU Pro COT 80 —
Overall (DE) 70.8 —
SealQA (12 distractors, >24k) 65.1 —
SealQA (no distractors, <24k) 80.7 —
Covered 49/55 6/55

Scorecard

Overall 0–100 score — category strengths (50%), shared-benchmark wins (30%), coverage (20%)

Model Overall score Shared benchmark wins Coverage Strongest at Weakest at
Kolibri-1 89.1 — 49 of 55 (89.0%) — —
Kimi K3 10.9 — 6 of 55 (11.0%) — —

Partial coverage benchmarks

Scored by at least one but not all selected models (55) — missing scores show as —

Benchmark Category Kimi K3 Kolibri-1
OmniScience Accuracy 1/2 models knowledge — 14.8
GPQA Diamond 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 84.3
IFBench (prompt loose) 1/2 models instruction_following — 78.1
SealQA (12 distractors, <24k) 1/2 models agentic — 61
LiveCodeBench v6 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 85.9
BFCL-V4 1/2 models general_agent — 61.4
AA-LCR 1/2 models long_context — 68.3
AIME 26 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 96
FRAMES (<24k) 1/2 models agentic — 71.2
German Public Sector 1/2 models agentic — 75
OmniScience Non-Hallucination 1/2 models knowledge — 44
Aerospace 1/2 models agentic — 58.9
Agentic Wiki QA (DE) 1/2 models agentic — 69.4
WMDP (Bio) 1/2 models safety 89.1 —
AIME 2025 (DE) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 87.5
Overall (EN) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 75.5
MuSiQue (EN) 1/2 models agentic — 77.3
SealQA (no distractors, >24k) 1/2 models agentic — 100
HPCT 1/2 models safety 59.6 —
HumanEval+ 1/2 models code — 92.7
MMLU-ProX 1/2 models multilingual — 75.5
BrowseComp 1/2 models general_agent — 29.4
BFCL v4 (web search) 1/2 models agentic — 62.5
RGB Closed-Book 1/2 models grounding_hallucination — 51
Lab Bench (ProtocolQA) 1/2 models safety 81.9 —
Industrial Drive Technology 1/2 models agentic — 60
AA-Omniscience Index (public set) 1/2 models knowledge — -32.8
Humanity's Last Exam (DE) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 15.9
SWE-bench Verified 1/2 models coding_agent — 66.4
Humanity's Last Exam 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 21.5
WMDP (Chem) 1/2 models safety 84.2 —
BFCL v4 (non-live AST) 1/2 models agentic — 79.1
BFCL v4 (live) 1/2 models agentic — 78.9
BFCL v4 (memory) 1/2 models agentic — 62.8
AIME 2026 (DE) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 90
Automotive Supplier 1/2 models agentic — 99
GPQA Diamond (DE) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 81.3
SQuAD (Utility Accuracy) 1/2 models grounding_hallucination — 83.4
Terminal Bench 2.1 1/2 models coding_agent — 27.7
AIME 2025 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 96.9
BFCL v4 (multi-turn) 1/2 models agentic — 47.5
RGB Fact-Check (Error Correction) 1/2 models grounding_hallucination — 34
SQuAD (M/A Grounding Score) 1/2 models grounding_hallucination — 23.4
LongBenchPro 1/2 models long_context — 64.5
FRAMES (>24k) 1/2 models agentic — 73
Semiconductors 1/2 models agentic — 80.4
Honeypot 1/2 models agentic — 80.8
TauBench V3 Banking 1/2 models general_agent — 38.1
MBCT 1/2 models safety 58.9 —
VCT 1/2 models safety 48 —
RGB Negative (Abstention) 1/2 models grounding_hallucination — 85.6
MMLU Pro COT 1/2 models knowledge — 80
Overall (DE) 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 70.8
SealQA (12 distractors, >24k) 1/2 models agentic — 65.1
SealQA (no distractors, <24k) 1/2 models agentic — 80.7

What now?

You've seen 2 models side by side — keep the loop going.

Share this comparison

The URL is the comparison — copy or share it anywhere. No tracking, no cookies.

Not the right matchup?

Swap one model out — the pre-filled form keeps the rest of the selection.

Swap Kimi K3 × Swap Kolibri-1 ×