Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B vs Ripple-65B Preview

New Comparison

Scores are fetched live from the current database on every visit — nothing is cached.

Benchmark Scores Comparison

Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B Ripple-65B Preview

Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B

Score: 15.0

Ripple-65B Preview

65.0B params

Coverage matrix

2 models × 29 benchmarks — hover a benchmark name for its category

Full Coverage Matrix
Hides benchmarks where all selected models score identically.
Shading = score relative to the best score among the selected models: Low Mid High Missing (—) The totals row shows how many of the 29 benchmarks each model has scores for.
Benchmark Ripple-65B Preview Ricursive Intelligence Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
GPQA Diamond 85.2 —
SWE-bench Pro 61.42 —
AA-LCR 75 —
AIME 26 95 —
AgentWorldBench Terminal — 57.73
AgentWorldBench Overall — 58.71
AutomationBench (Public) 36.4 —
StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive) 97.5 —
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard 79.1 —
AgentWorldBench Web — 50.98
MMLU-Pro 84.2 —
AgentWorldBench Search — 37.82
AIME 2024 97.1 —
MMLU 89.6 —
IFBench 79.2 —
SWE-bench Verified 76.5 —
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) 80.5 —
HMMT Feb 26 90.5 —
AgentWorldBench OS — 67.89
AgentWorldBench MCP — 68.24
Terminal Bench 2.1 80.5 —
AIME 2025 98.3 —
AgentWorldBench SWE — 68.49
TauBench V3 Banking 31.27 —
MCP-Atlas 71.67 —
AgentWorldBench Android — 60.2
DeepSWE 1.1 44.3 —
FORTRESS Benign 95.5 —
SciCode 39.4 —
Covered 21/29 8/29

Scorecard

Overall 0–100 score — category strengths (50%), shared-benchmark wins (30%), coverage (20%)

Model Overall score Shared benchmark wins Coverage Strongest at Weakest at
Ripple-65B Preview 72.4 — 21 of 29 (72.0%) — —
Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B 27.6 — 8 of 29 (28.0%) — —

Partial coverage benchmarks

Scored by at least one but not all selected models (29) — missing scores show as —

Benchmark Category Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B Ripple-65B Preview
GPQA Diamond 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 85.2
SWE-bench Pro 1/2 models coding_agent — 61.42
AA-LCR 1/2 models long_context — 75
AIME 26 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 95
AgentWorldBench Terminal 1/2 models general_agent 57.73 —
AgentWorldBench Overall 1/2 models general_agent 58.71 —
AutomationBench (Public) 1/2 models general_agent — 36.4
StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive) 1/2 models safety — 97.5
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard 1/2 models coding_agent — 79.1
AgentWorldBench Web 1/2 models general_agent 50.98 —
MMLU-Pro 1/2 models knowledge — 84.2
AgentWorldBench Search 1/2 models general_agent 37.82 —
AIME 2024 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 97.1
MMLU 1/2 models knowledge — 89.6
IFBench 1/2 models instruction_following — 79.2
SWE-bench Verified 1/2 models coding_agent — 76.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) 1/2 models coding_agent — 80.5
HMMT Feb 26 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 90.5
AgentWorldBench OS 1/2 models general_agent 67.89 —
AgentWorldBench MCP 1/2 models general_agent 68.24 —
Terminal Bench 2.1 1/2 models coding_agent — 80.5
AIME 2025 1/2 models stem_reasoning — 98.3
AgentWorldBench SWE 1/2 models general_agent 68.49 —
TauBench V3 Banking 1/2 models general_agent — 31.27
MCP-Atlas 1/2 models general_agent — 71.67
AgentWorldBench Android 1/2 models general_agent 60.2 —
DeepSWE 1.1 1/2 models coding_agent — 44.3
FORTRESS Benign 1/2 models safety — 95.5
SciCode 1/2 models — — 39.4

What now?

You've seen 2 models side by side — keep the loop going.

Share this comparison

The URL is the comparison — copy or share it anywhere. No tracking, no cookies.

Not the right matchup?

Swap one model out — the pre-filled form keeps the rest of the selection.

Swap Qwen-AgentWorld-397B-A17B × Swap Ripple-65B Preview ×