Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B

New Comparison

Scores are fetched live from the current database on every visit — nothing is cached.

Winner

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B wins this comparison with an overall score of 84 vs 63 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 14 of 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 84.2 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 63.2 Qwen3.5-9B 24.6

Based on 17 of 120 benchmarks scored by all 3 selected models.

Benchmark Scores Comparison

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

35.0B params

Score: 100.0

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Score: 15.0

Qwen3.5-9B

Score: 15.0

Coverage matrix

3 models × 120 benchmarks — hover a benchmark name for its category

Full Coverage Matrix
Hides benchmarks where all selected models score identically.
Shading = score relative to the best score among the selected models: Low Mid High Missing (—) The totals row shows how many of the 120 benchmarks each model has scores for.
Benchmark Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) Qwen3.5-9B Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
OmniScience Accuracy — 35.9 —
Apex-Shortlist (with tools) — 60.4 —
HMMT Feb 25 90.7 94.8 —
DynaMath 82.8 86.3 —
GPQA Diamond 86 88.4 —
IFBench (prompt loose) — 78.2 —
MathVista (mini) 86.4 — —
MMBench EN-DEV v1.1 92.8 — —
ProfBench (Search) — 53 —
LiveCodeBench v6 80.4 83.6 —
TauBench V3 Retail — 88.5 —
SWE-bench Pro 49.5 50.9 33.8
BFCL-V4 64.7 — 66.1
RealWorldQA 85.3 83.9 —
EmbSpatialBench 84.3 — —
AA-LCR 69.3 68.3 63
AIME 26 92.7 93.3 88.2
AgentWorldBench Terminal — 55.3 —
Toolathlon Verified 41.7 38.3 —
VITA-Bench 35.6 — 15.6
TAU3-Bench 67.2 — 9.3
AgentWorldBench Overall — 54.74 —
OmniScience Non-Hallucination — 7.4 —
AutomationBench (Public) 24.9 — —
MMStar 80.7 83.8 —
GDPVal 67.4 34.6 —
Apex-Shortlist (no tools) — 61.4 —
TauBench V3 Average — 71 —
SWE Atlas - TW 13.3 18.5 4.4
IOI 2025 — 441.3 —
Longbench v2 (≤ 1M) — 68.9 —
WildClawBench 68.7 70.7 —
AgentWorldBench Web — 48.55 —
SWE Atlas - QnA 15.5 20.4 9.2
AI2D_TEST 92.7 — —
ParseBench Text Formatting 58.3 — —
NL2Repo 29.4 32.2 16.2
MMMU-Pro 75.3 79 —
TauBench V3 Airline — 76.5 —
QwenClawBench 52.6 51.8 —
Claw-Eval Avg 68.7 70.7 53.2
VideoMMMU 83.7 84.7 —
HMMT Nov 25 89.1 92.7 —
Multi-Challenge 58.2 63.9 —
PinchBench — 86.6 —
MMLU-ProX — 86.4 —
MMLU-Pro 85.2 87.8 —
SuperGPQA 64.7 70.4 —
AgentWorldBench Search — 30.81 —
IFEval — — 91.5
HLE (with tools) 28.9 48.3 —
LVBench 71.4 — —
CharXiv (RQ) 78 80.8 —
RULER (1M) — 90.1 —
GDP.pdf 6.6 — —
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (without web search) — 61.3 —
CritPt (no tools) — 2.4 —
BrowseComp 62 40.5 8.3
MMLU-Redux 93.3 94.9 —
ParseBench Text Content 90.7 — —
MCPMark 37 — 13.4
AA-Omniscience Index (public set) -7.2 — —
SWE-bench Multilingual 67.2 69.3 43.3
MLVU 86.2 86.7 —
TauBench V3 Telecom — 98 —
IFBench 66.6 — 64.5
SWE-bench Verified 73.4 76.2 53.1
IMOAnswerBench 78.9 80.9 69.8
Humanity's Last Exam 21.4 28.7 14.3
CountBench 96.1 97.2 —
ERQA 61.8 67.5 —
VideoMME (w/o sub.) 82.5 — —
Terminal-Bench 2.0 51.5 52.5 —
IMOAnswerBench (with tools) — 84.51 —
DeepPlanning 25.9 — —
QwenWebBench 1397 1186 —
TAU2-Bench — — 79.1
ODInW13 50.8 — —
VlmsAreBlind 96.6 — —
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) 52.5 53.5 21.3
DeepSWE 0 1 —
OmniDocBench 1.5 89.9 — —
HallusionBench 69.8 — —
OCRBench 90 — —
HMMT Feb 26 83.6 87.9 70.8
Terminal-Bench Lite 63.3 — —
AgentWorldBench OS — 60.85 —
AgentWorldBench MCP — 68.31 —
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (with web search) — 59 —
GPQA — — 77.2
AgentWorldBench SWE — 64.44 —
CC-OCR 81.9 82 —
RefCOCO (avg) 92 92.3 —
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 32 — —
SciCode (subtask) — 48 —
Tool Decathlon 26.9 — —
Frontier-Bench v0.1 1.4 1.4 —
ParseBench Mean 44.1 — —
ZEROBench_sub 34.4 — —
C-Eval 90 93 —
WideSearch 60.1 74 —
SimpleVQA 58.9 67.1 —
VideoMME (w sub.) 86.6 87.5 —
Workspace Bench — — 25.5
SkillsBench Avg5 28.7 30 —
TauBench V3 Banking — 20.9 —
Claw-Eval Pass^3 50 48.1 —
WMT24++ (en→xx) — 86.8 —
MCP-Atlas 62.8 72.3 47.4
SWE Atlas - RF 11.4 18.4 4.3
V-Star 90.1 95.8 —
AgentWorldBench Android — 54.9 —
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code) 49.2 48.6 18.9
Chatbot Korean (internal) 74.5 — —
Gaokao 2026 — — 135.5
SciCode 35.6 — 32.7
RefSpatialBench 64.3 — —
BrowseComp Plus 34.8 — —
MMMU 81.7 85 —
MVBench 74.6 77.6 —
Covered 85/120 84/120 28/120

Scorecard

Overall 0–100 score — category strengths (50%), shared-benchmark wins (30%), coverage (20%)

Model Overall score Shared benchmark wins Coverage Strongest at Weakest at
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Winner 84.2 14 of 17 84 of 120 (70.0%) Video Understanding General Agents
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 63.2 3 of 17 85 of 120 (71.0%) Other Vision & Language
Qwen3.5-9B 24.6 0 of 17 28 of 120 (23.0%) Long Context Agentic Coding

Category strengths

Where each model stands, per benchmark category — score relative to the best model, adjusted for benchmark coverage. This also ranks models when they share few benchmarks.

Category Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-9B
General Agents 31 benchmarks 54.2 93.8 35
Agentic Coding 19 benchmarks 96.4 84 24.2
STEM & Reasoning 15 benchmarks 100 84.8 55.2
Vision & Language 12 benchmarks 99.5 83.7 —
Document Understanding 8 benchmarks 100 90.2 —
Knowledge 7 benchmarks 100 85.8 —
Spatial Intelligence 6 benchmarks 100 87.8 —
Video Understanding 6 benchmarks 100 93.4 —
Instruction Following 4 benchmarks 77.5 86.7 73.8
Long Context 4 benchmarks 98.6 100 90.9
Other 3 benchmarks — 100 90.2

Fully comparable benchmarks

Scored by all 3 selected models (17)

Benchmark Category Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Qwen3.5-9B
SWE-bench Pro coding_agent 49.5 50.9 33.8
AA-LCR long_context 69.3 68.3 63
AIME 26 stem_reasoning 92.7 93.3 88.2
SWE Atlas - TW coding_agent 13.3 18.5 4.4
SWE Atlas - QnA coding_agent 15.5 20.4 9.2
NL2Repo coding_agent 29.4 32.2 16.2
Claw-Eval Avg coding_agent 68.7 70.7 53.2
BrowseComp general_agent 62 40.5 8.3
SWE-bench Multilingual coding_agent 67.2 69.3 43.3
SWE-bench Verified coding_agent 73.4 76.2 53.1
IMOAnswerBench stem_reasoning 78.9 80.9 69.8
Humanity's Last Exam stem_reasoning 21.4 28.7 14.3
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) coding_agent 52.5 53.5 21.3
HMMT Feb 26 stem_reasoning 83.6 87.9 70.8
MCP-Atlas general_agent 62.8 72.3 47.4
SWE Atlas - RF coding_agent 11.4 18.4 4.3
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code) coding_agent 49.2 48.6 18.9

Partial coverage benchmarks

Scored by at least one but not all selected models (103) — missing scores show as —

Benchmark Category Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Qwen3.5-9B
OmniScience Accuracy 1/3 models knowledge — 35.9 —
Apex-Shortlist (with tools) 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 60.4 —
HMMT Feb 25 2/3 models stem_reasoning 90.7 94.8 —
DynaMath 2/3 models vision_language 82.8 86.3 —
GPQA Diamond 2/3 models stem_reasoning 86 88.4 —
IFBench (prompt loose) 1/3 models instruction_following — 78.2 —
MathVista (mini) 1/3 models vision_language 86.4 — —
MMBench EN-DEV v1.1 1/3 models vision_language 92.8 — —
ProfBench (Search) 1/3 models general_agent — 53 —
LiveCodeBench v6 2/3 models stem_reasoning 80.4 83.6 —
TauBench V3 Retail 1/3 models general_agent — 88.5 —
BFCL-V4 2/3 models general_agent 64.7 — 66.1
RealWorldQA 2/3 models vision_language 85.3 83.9 —
EmbSpatialBench 1/3 models spatial_intelligence 84.3 — —
AgentWorldBench Terminal 1/3 models general_agent — 55.3 —
Toolathlon Verified 2/3 models general_agent 41.7 38.3 —
VITA-Bench 2/3 models general_agent 35.6 — 15.6
TAU3-Bench 2/3 models general_agent 67.2 — 9.3
AgentWorldBench Overall 1/3 models general_agent — 54.74 —
OmniScience Non-Hallucination 1/3 models knowledge — 7.4 —
AutomationBench (Public) 1/3 models general_agent 24.9 — —
MMStar 2/3 models vision_language 80.7 83.8 —
GDPVal 2/3 models general_agent 67.4 34.6 —
Apex-Shortlist (no tools) 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 61.4 —
TauBench V3 Average 1/3 models general_agent — 71 —
IOI 2025 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 441.3 —
Longbench v2 (≤ 1M) 1/3 models long_context — 68.9 —
WildClawBench 2/3 models coding_agent 68.7 70.7 —
AgentWorldBench Web 1/3 models general_agent — 48.55 —
AI2D_TEST 1/3 models document_understanding 92.7 — —
ParseBench Text Formatting 1/3 models document_understanding 58.3 — —
MMMU-Pro 2/3 models vision_language 75.3 79 —
TauBench V3 Airline 1/3 models general_agent — 76.5 —
QwenClawBench 2/3 models coding_agent 52.6 51.8 —
VideoMMMU 2/3 models video_understanding 83.7 84.7 —
HMMT Nov 25 2/3 models stem_reasoning 89.1 92.7 —
Multi-Challenge 2/3 models instruction_following 58.2 63.9 —
PinchBench 1/3 models general_agent — 86.6 —
MMLU-ProX 1/3 models multilingual — 86.4 —
MMLU-Pro 2/3 models knowledge 85.2 87.8 —
SuperGPQA 2/3 models knowledge 64.7 70.4 —
AgentWorldBench Search 1/3 models general_agent — 30.81 —
IFEval 1/3 models instruction_following — — 91.5
HLE (with tools) 2/3 models stem_reasoning 28.9 48.3 —
LVBench 1/3 models video_understanding 71.4 — —
CharXiv (RQ) 2/3 models document_understanding 78 80.8 —
RULER (1M) 1/3 models long_context — 90.1 —
GDP.pdf 1/3 models long_context 6.6 — —
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (without web search) 1/3 models general_agent — 61.3 —
CritPt (no tools) 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 2.4 —
MMLU-Redux 2/3 models knowledge 93.3 94.9 —
ParseBench Text Content 1/3 models document_understanding 90.7 — —
MCPMark 2/3 models general_agent 37 — 13.4
AA-Omniscience Index (public set) 1/3 models knowledge -7.2 — —
MLVU 2/3 models video_understanding 86.2 86.7 —
TauBench V3 Telecom 1/3 models general_agent — 98 —
IFBench 2/3 models instruction_following 66.6 — 64.5
CountBench 2/3 models spatial_intelligence 96.1 97.2 —
ERQA 2/3 models spatial_intelligence 61.8 67.5 —
VideoMME (w/o sub.) 1/3 models video_understanding 82.5 — —
Terminal-Bench 2.0 2/3 models coding_agent 51.5 52.5 —
IMOAnswerBench (with tools) 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 84.51 —
DeepPlanning 1/3 models general_agent 25.9 — —
QwenWebBench 2/3 models coding_agent 1397 1186 —
TAU2-Bench 1/3 models general_agent — — 79.1
ODInW13 1/3 models spatial_intelligence 50.8 — —
VlmsAreBlind 1/3 models vision_language 96.6 — —
DeepSWE 2/3 models coding_agent 0 1 —
OmniDocBench 1.5 1/3 models document_understanding 89.9 — —
HallusionBench 1/3 models vision_language 69.8 — —
OCRBench 1/3 models document_understanding 90 — —
Terminal-Bench Lite 1/3 models coding_agent 63.3 — —
AgentWorldBench OS 1/3 models general_agent — 60.85 —
AgentWorldBench MCP 1/3 models general_agent — 68.31 —
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (with web search) 1/3 models general_agent — 59 —
GPQA 1/3 models reasoning — — 77.2
AgentWorldBench SWE 1/3 models general_agent — 64.44 —
CC-OCR 2/3 models document_understanding 81.9 82 —
RefCOCO (avg) 2/3 models spatial_intelligence 92 92.3 —
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 1/3 models composite 32 — —
SciCode (subtask) 1/3 models stem_reasoning — 48 —
Tool Decathlon 1/3 models general_agent 26.9 — —
Frontier-Bench v0.1 2/3 models coding_agent 1.4 1.4 —
ParseBench Mean 1/3 models document_understanding 44.1 — —
ZEROBench_sub 1/3 models vision_language 34.4 — —
C-Eval 2/3 models knowledge 90 93 —
WideSearch 2/3 models general_agent 60.1 74 —
SimpleVQA 2/3 models vision_language 58.9 67.1 —
VideoMME (w sub.) 2/3 models video_understanding 86.6 87.5 —
Workspace Bench 1/3 models — — — 25.5
SkillsBench Avg5 2/3 models coding_agent 28.7 30 —
TauBench V3 Banking 1/3 models general_agent — 20.9 —
Claw-Eval Pass^3 2/3 models coding_agent 50 48.1 —
WMT24++ (en→xx) 1/3 models multilingual — 86.8 —
V-Star 2/3 models vision_language 90.1 95.8 —
AgentWorldBench Android 1/3 models general_agent — 54.9 —
Chatbot Korean (internal) 1/3 models multilingual 74.5 — —
Gaokao 2026 1/3 models — — — 135.5
SciCode 2/3 models — 35.6 — 32.7
RefSpatialBench 1/3 models spatial_intelligence 64.3 — —
BrowseComp Plus 1/3 models general_agent 34.8 — —
MMMU 2/3 models vision_language 81.7 85 —
MVBench 2/3 models video_understanding 74.6 77.6 —

Comparison FAQ

Which model scores highest in this comparison?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B wins this comparison with an overall score of 84 vs 63 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 14 of 17 shared benchmarks.

Which model is strongest at Agentic Coding?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads the Agentic Coding category (strength score 96.4/100 across 17 comparable benchmarks).

How reliable is this comparison verdict?

Based on 17 of 120 benchmarks scored by all 3 selected models.

What now?

You've seen 3 models side by side — keep the loop going.

Share this comparison

The URL is the comparison — copy or share it anywhere. No tracking, no cookies.

Not the right matchup?

Open the create form with these models pre-filled and untick the one you want to replace.

Swap a model