GLM-5.2

Zhipu AI

Parameters

753.0B total / 40.0B active

MoE: total / active

Architecture

MoE with IndexShare sparse attention + MTP layer

Released

16.06.2026

License

MIT License

Open Weights Commercial Use Multimodal BF16, F32 GLM en zh

Input Modalities

text

Output Modalities

text

Context (native)

1,000,000 tokens

Context (extended)

1,000,000 tokens

Openness Index Score 100.0/100

About

GLM-5.2 (zai-org/GLM-5.2) is Z.ai's flagship model for long-horizon tasks - a large sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLM (~744-753B total parameters, ~40B active per token) that for the first time delivers long-horizon capability on a solid 1M-token context, released June 16, 2026 under the MIT License (no regional limits).

Its headline improvements over GLM-5.1: a stable 1M context that sustains long-horizon work; advanced coding with flexible thinking effort levels to balance performance and latency; and an improved architecture built around IndexShare - reusing the same sparse-attention indexer across every four attention layers (21 full + 57 shared indexers in the 78-layer stack, index top-k 2048 with 32 index heads of dim 128), which cuts per-token FLOPs by 2.9x at 1M context. The backbone (GlmMoeDsa) pairs DeepSeek-Sparse-Attention-style indexing with MLA-style compressed KV (kv-LoRA rank 512, 64 heads of dim 192), 3 dense + 75 sparse MoE layers, 256 routed experts + 1 shared with 8 routed per token (expert FFN 2048, sigmoid scoring, noaux-tc), hidden size 6144, vocab 155K, and an improved Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) layer for speculative decoding with up to 20% longer acceptance length.

GLM-5.2 leads open-weights models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v4.1, 11 points above GLM-5.1), with strong agentic/coding results (SWE-Bench Pro, NL2Repo, DeepSWE, HLE-with-tools at up to 400K context).

Training Data Trained as part of GLM-5 series with long-horizon task focus

Benchmark Scores

Benchmark Score Date
Humanity's Last Exam
stem_reasoning
72.73%
17.06.2026
HLE (with tools)
stem_reasoning
79.24%
17.06.2026
CritPt (no tools)
stem_reasoning
64.04%
17.06.2026
AIME 26
stem_reasoning
100.00%
17.06.2026
HMMT Nov 25
stem_reasoning
89.34%
17.06.2026
HMMT Feb 26
stem_reasoning
93.26%
17.06.2026
IMOAnswerBench
stem_reasoning
97.16%
17.06.2026
GPQA Diamond
stem_reasoning
94.14%
17.06.2026
SWE-bench Pro
coding_agent
77.62%
17.06.2026
NL2Repo
coding_agent
59.38%
17.06.2026
DeepSWE 1.1
coding_agent
57.70%
17.06.2026
ProgramBench
coding_agent
88.10%
17.06.2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2)
coding_agent
88.50%
17.06.2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness)
coding_agent
95.14%
17.06.2026
SWE-Marathon
coding_agent
24.49%
17.06.2026
MCP-Atlas
general_agent
87.82%
17.06.2026
Tool Decathlon
general_agent
75.57%
17.06.2026
PostTrainBench
coding_agent
72.35%
17.06.2026
WildClawBench
coding_agent
73.09%
17.06.2026
Terminal Bench 2.1
coding_agent
89.36%
31.07.2026
DeepSWE
coding_agent
63.55%
31.07.2026
Toolathlon Verified
general_agent
64.07%
31.07.2026
Agents' Last Exam
general_agent
62.26%
31.07.2026
Automation-Bench
general_agent
4.77%
31.07.2026
DSBench-FullStack
coding_agent
61.69%
31.07.2026
DSBench-Hard
coding_agent
62.53%
31.07.2026
GDPVal-AA v2
general_agent
82.14%
27.08.2026
Terminal-Bench 3.0
coding_agent
4.60
28.08.2026
Cybergym
general_agent
77.94%
28.08.2026
ExploitGym (2h)
cybersecurity
7.43%
28.08.2026
ExploitGym (6h)
cybersecurity
4.87%
28.08.2026
ExploitBench
cybersecurity
24.40
28.08.2026
FrontierSWE
coding_agent
76.69%
17.06.2026

Flexible Thinking Effort Levels

Flexible Thinking Effort Levels

GLM-5.2 introduces effort level control, enabling users to explicitly balance model capability against task execution speed and computational cost.

Effort Levels

The model supports multiple thinking effort levels (e.g., low, medium, max) that control how much reasoning the model performs before generating a response.

Performance vs. Cost Trade-off

As shown in the GLM-5.2 blog, the model delivers substantially stronger agentic coding performance than GLM-5.1 at comparable token budgets. Its capability is roughly positioned between Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 under similar token consumption.

The Max effort level allows users to allocate additional computation when higher performance is required for challenging tasks, further extending the model's coding capability.

Evaluation Usage

  • ProgramBench: Uses reasoning_effort=max with 400K context
  • FrontierSWE: Uses max effort level with 1M context
  • PostTrainBench: Uses max effort level with 1M context
  • SWE-Marathon: Uses max effort level with 1M context

MIT Open Source License

MIT Open Source License

GLM-5.2 is released under the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses available.

Key Terms

  • Commercial use: Allowed (the model is marked as commercial_use_allowed: True in the DB)
  • Open source: Fully open source (is_open_source: True)
  • No regional limits: The license explicitly states "no regional limits, technical access without borders"
  • Modification and redistribution: Permitted under MIT terms

Significance

The "Pure Open" positioning is a key differentiator for GLM-5.2. Unlike many frontier models that restrict usage by region or impose commercial limitations, GLM-5.2 provides unrestricted access under MIT, making it one of the most openly available frontier-class models.

Model Tree and Ecosystem

Model Tree and Ecosystem

Model Tree for zai-org/GLM-5.2

Type Count
Adapters 1 model
Finetunes 24 models
Quantizations 142 models

Community Resources

Community

Notable Quantizations

Statistics

  • Downloads (last month): 2,576,335
  • Likes: 5.04K
  • Followers: 19K

BibTeX Citation

BibTeX Citation

If you find GLM-5.2 useful in your research, please cite the technical report:

@misc{glm5team2026glm5vibecodingagentic,
      title={GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering},
      author={GLM-5-Team and Aohan Zeng and Xin Lv and Zhenyu Hou and Zhengxiao Du and Qinkai Zheng and Bin Chen and Da Yin and Chendi Ge and Chenghua Huang and Chengxing Xie and Chenzheng Zhu and Congfeng Yin and Cunxiang Wang and Gengzheng Pan and Hao Zeng and Haoke Zhang and Haoran Wang and Huilong Chen and Jiajie Zhang and Jian Jiao and Jiaqi Guo and Jingsen Wang and Jingzhao Du and Jinzhu Wu and Kedong Wang and Lei Li and Lin Fan and Lucen Zhong and Mingdao Liu and Mingming Zhao and Pengfan Du and Qian Dong and Rui Lu and Shuang-Li and Shulin Cao and Song Liu and Ting Jiang and Xiaodong Chen and Xiaohan Zhang and Xuancheng Huang and Xuezhen Dong and Yabo Xu and Yao Wei and Yifan An and Yilin Niu and Yitong Zhu and Yuanhao Wen and Yukuo Cen and Yushi Bai and Zhongpei Qiao and Zihan Wang and Zikang Wang and Zilin Zhu and Ziqiang Liu and Zixuan Li and Bojie Wang and Bosi Wen and Can Huang and Changpeng Cai and Chao Yu and Chen Li and Chengwei Hu and Chenhui Zhang and Dan Zhang and Daoyan Lin and Dayong Yang and Di Wang and Ding Ai and Erle Zhu and Fangzhou Yi and Feiyu Chen and Guohong Wen and Hailong Sun and Haisha Zhao and Haiyi Hu and Hanchen Zhang and Hanrui Liu and Hanyu Zhang and Hao Peng and Hao Tai and Haobo Zhang and He Liu and Hongwei Wang and Hongxi Yan and Hongyu Ge and Huan Liu and Huanpeng Chu and Jia'ni Zhao and Jiachen Wang and Jiajing Zhao and Jiamin Ren and Jiapeng Wang and Jiaxin Zhang and Jiayi Gui and Jiayue Zhao and Jijie Li and Jing An and Jing Li and Jingwei Yuan and Jinhua Du and Jinxin Liu and Junkai Zhi and Junwen Duan and Kaiyue Zhou and Kangjian Wei and Ke Wang and Keyun Luo and Laiqiang Zhang and Leigang Sha and Liang Xu and Lindong Wu and Lintao Ding and Lu Chen and Minghao Li and Nianyi Lin and Pan Ta and Qiang Zou and Rongjun Song and Ruiqi Yang and Shangqing Tu and Shangtong Yang and Shaoxiang Wu and Shengyan Zhang and Shijie Li and Shuang Li and Shuyi Fan and Wei Qin and Wei Tian and Weining Zhang and Wenbo Yu and Wenjie Liang and Xiang Kuang and Xiangmeng Cheng and Xiangyang Li and Xiaoquan Yan and Xiaowei Hu and Xiaoying Ling and Xing Fan and Xingye Xia and Xinyuan Zhang and Xinze Zhang and Xirui Pan and Xu Zou and Xunkai Zhang and Yadi Liu and Yandong Wu and Yanfu Li and Yidong Wang and Yifan Zhu and Yijun Tan and Yilin Zhou and Yiming Pan and Ying Zhang and Yinpei Su and Yipeng Geng and Yong Yan and Yonglin Tan and Yuean Bi and Yuhan Shen and Yuhao Yang and Yujiang Li and Yunan Liu and Yunqing Wang and Yuntao Li and Yurong Wu and Yutao Zhang and Yuxi Duan and Yuxuan Zhang and Zezhen Liu and Zhengtao Jiang and Zhenhe Yan and Zheyu Zhang and Zhixiang Wei and Zhuo Chen and Zhuoer Feng and Zijun Yao and Ziwei Chai and Ziyuan Wang and Zuzhou Zhang and Bin Xu and Minlie Huang and Hongning Wang and Juanzi Li and Yuxiao Dong and Jie Tang},
      year={2026},
      eprint={2602.15763},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.LG},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15763}
}

Related Papers

  • GLM-5 Technical Report: arXiv:2602.15763 — "GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering"
  • IndexShare Paper: arXiv:2603.12201 — "IndexCache: Accelerating Sparse Attention via Cross-Layer Index Reuse"

Evaluation Methodology

Evaluation Methodology

Reasoning Benchmarks

  • HLE & other reasoning tasks: Sampling parameters: temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95. Maximum generation length: 163,840 tokens. Text-only subset reported by default; results marked with * are from the full set. Judge model: GPT-5.5 (medium). For HLE-with-tools: max context length 300,000 tokens, no context management strategy.
  • AIME, HMMT, IMOAnswerBench: System prompt: Your response should be in the following format: Explanation: {your explanation} Exact Answer: {your succinct, final answer} Confidence: {your confidence score between 0% and 100%}. Judge: GPT-5.5 (medium).

Coding Benchmarks

  • SWE-Bench Pro: Run with OpenHands using a tailored instruction prompt. Settings: temperature=1, top_p=1, max_new_tokens=32k, 400K context window.
  • NL2Repo: temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, max_new_tokens=48k, 400K context. Rule-based and LLM-based judgement to prevent malicious behaviors.
  • DeepSWE: Official pier evaluation framework, mini-swe-agent harness. temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, timeout=2h, 400K context. Isolated container: 2 CPUs, 8 GB RAM, no internet.
  • ProgramBench: 200 instances, Claude-Code 2.1.156. temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, max_tokens=64000, max_turns=2000, sample_timeout=6h, reasoning_effort=max, 400K context. Sandbox: 4 CPUs, 8 GB RAM, internet disabled.
  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus 2): Terminus-2 framework, parser=json, timeout=4h, temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, max_new_tokens=48k, max_episodes=500, 256K context. Resources: 4 CPUs, 8 GB RAM.
  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code): Claude Code 2.1.167, temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, max_new_tokens=131072 (overridden to 128k via proxy). No wall-clock time limits. Scores averaged over 5 runs.
  • FrontierSWE: Conducted by Proximal. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens. Dominance score as of 2026/06/16.
  • PostTrainBench: Conducted by PostTrainBench. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens.
  • SWE-Marathon: Conducted by Abundant AI. 1M context, max effort, 128K max output tokens.

Agentic Benchmarks

  • MCP-Atlas: Think mode, 500-task public subset, 10-minute timeout per task. Judge: Gemini-3.0-Pro.
  • Tool-Decathlon: Official evaluation service, max_token=128K.

Supported Inference Frameworks

Supported Inference Frameworks

GLM-5.2 supports deployment with the following inference frameworks:

GPU Deployment

Framework Minimum Version Reference
SGLang v0.5.13.post1+ cookbook
vLLM v0.23.0+ recipes
Transformers v0.5.12+ transformers docs
KTransformers v0.5.12+ tutorial
Unsloth v0.1.47-beta+ guide

Ascend NPU Deployment

For deployment on the Ascend NPU platform, the following inference frameworks are supported:

  • vLLM-Ascend
  • xLLM
  • SGLang

Reference: Ascend deployment guide

GLM-5.2 Full Benchmark Results

GLM-5.2 Full Benchmark Results

All scores are for GLM-5.2. Comparative models shown for context.

Reasoning Benchmarks

Benchmark GLM-5.2 GLM-5.1 Qwen3.7-Max MiniMax M3 DeepSeek-V4-Pro Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE 40.5 31 41.4 37 37.7 49.8* 41.4* 45
HLE (w/ Tools) 54.7 52.3 53.5 - 48.2 57.9* 52.2* 51.4*
CritPt 20.9 4.6 13.4 3.7 12.9 20.9 27.1 17.7
AIME 2026 99.2 95.3 97 - 94.6 95.7 98.3 98.2
HMMT Nov. 2025 94.4 94 95 84.4 94.4 96.5 96.5 94.8
HMMT Feb. 2026 92.5 82.6 97.1 84.4 95.2 96.7 96.7 87.3
IMOAnswerBench 91.0 83.8 90 - 89.8 83.5 - 81
GPQA-Diamond 91.2 86.2 90 93 90.1 93.6 93.6 94.3

Coding Benchmarks

Benchmark GLM-5.2 GLM-5.1 Qwen3.7-Max MiniMax M3 DeepSeek-V4-Pro Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-bench Pro 62.1 58.4 60.6 59 55.4 69.2 58.6 54.2
NL2Repo 48.9 42.7 47.2 42.1 35.5 69.7 50.7 33.4
DeepSWE 46.2 18 18 20 8 58 70 10
ProgramBench 63.7 50.9 - - 47.8 71.9 70.8 39.5
Terminal Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) 81.0 63.5 75 65 64 85 84 74
Terminal Bench 2.1 (Best Reported Harness) 82.7 69 - - - 78.9 83.4 70.7
FrontierSWE (Dominance) 74.4 30.5 - - 29.0 75.1 72.6 39.6
PostTrainBench 34.3 20.1 - - - 37.2 28.4 21.6
SWE-Marathon 13.0 1.0 - - - 26.0 12.0 4.0

Agentic Benchmarks

Benchmark GLM-5.2 GLM-5.1 Qwen3.7-Max MiniMax M3 DeepSeek-V4-Pro Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro
MCP-Atlas (Public Set) 76.8 71.8 76.4 74.2 73.6 77.8 75.3 69.2
Tool-Decathlon 48.2 40.7 - - 52.8 59.9 55.6 48.8

Key Takeaways

  • GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms GLM-5.1 across all benchmark categories
  • On Terminal Bench 2.1, GLM-5.2 (81.0) is within a few points of Claude Opus 4.8 (85.0)
  • On DeepSWE, GLM-5.2 (46.2) is a massive improvement over GLM-5.1 (18.0)
  • On FrontierSWE (Dominance), GLM-5.2 (74.4) is competitive with Claude Opus 4.8 (75.1)
  • Scores marked with * are from the full HLE set, not text-only subset

1M Token Native Context

Solid 1M-Token Context

GLM-5.2 delivers, for the first time in the GLM series, a solid 1M-token context that stably sustains long-horizon work.

Context Window

  • Native context length: 1,000,000 tokens (1M)
  • Extended context length: 1,000,000 tokens (1M) — no extension beyond native
  • Stability: The context is described as "solid" — it stably sustains long-horizon tasks without degradation, a substantial improvement over GLM-5.1.

Significance

This 1M context is a core differentiator for GLM-5.2, enabling it to handle long-horizon agentic coding tasks, large document processing, and extended multi-turn reasoning that were not feasible with GLM-5.1's context window.

MTP Layer for Speculative Decoding

MTP Layer for Speculative Decoding

GLM-5.2 improves the Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) layer used for speculative decoding, achieving two key objectives:

Improvements over GLM-5.1

  1. Increased acceptance length: The MTP layer improvements increase the speculative decoding acceptance length by up to 20% compared to GLM-5.1.
  2. Training-inference consistency: GLM-5.2 eliminates the training-inference discrepancy present in GLM-5.1's MTP layer. In the two-step MTP inference, the first step is consistent with training (all hidden states from the target model). The second step resolves the mismatch where some hidden states come from the MTP layer rather than the target model.

How It Works

In a two-step MTP layer:

  • Step 1: All hidden states come from the target model — inference is consistent with training.
  • Step 2: Some hidden states come from the target model and some from the MTP layer, which previously caused a training-inference discrepancy in GLM-5.1.

IndexShare Sparse Attention

IndexShare Sparse Attention

GLM-5.2 introduces IndexShare, a novel architectural innovation for sparse attention that reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers.

Key Properties

  • Cross-layer index reuse: The same indexer is shared across groups of four consecutive sparse attention layers, eliminating redundant indexer computations.
  • FLOP reduction: Reduces per-token FLOPs by 2.9× at a 1M context length compared to non-shared indexing.
  • Architecture tag: glm_moe_dsa (GLM Mixture-of-Experts with Dynamic Sparse Attention)

Related Papers

Model Configuration

  • Total Parameters: 753B
  • Architecture Type: MoE with IndexShare sparse attention + MTP layer
  • Tensor Types: BF16, F32

GLM-5.2 Introduction and Key Capabilities

GLM-5.2 Introduction and Key Capabilities

GLM-5.2 is the latest flagship model from Zhipu AI (zai-org), designed for long-horizon tasks. It marks a substantial leap in long-horizon task capability over its predecessor GLM-5.1 and, for the first time, delivers that capability on a solid 1M-token context.

Key Capabilities

  1. Solid 1M Context — A solid 1M-token context that stably sustains long-horizon work.
  2. Advanced Coding with Flexible Effort — Stronger coding capabilities with multiple thinking effort levels to balance performance and latency.
  3. Improved Architecture — IndexShare reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers, reducing per-token FLOPs by 2.9× at a 1M context length. The MTP layer for speculative decoding is improved, increasing acceptance length by up to 20%.
  4. Pure Open — An MIT open-source license with no regional limits and technical access without borders.

Model Identity

  • Provider: Zhipu AI (zai-org)
  • Model Family: GLM
  • Release Date: 2026-06-16
  • Parameters: 753B
  • Tensor Type: BF16, F32
  • Languages: English, Chinese
  • Tags: Text Generation, Transformers, Safetensors, glm_moe_dsa, conversational, Eval Results

Architecture

Decoder Block input Embedding vocab 155K · d 6144 Full Attention 64 heads · dₕ 192 ×78 MoE FFN 256 experts · top-8 · +1 shared · dᴻ 2048 MTP Head ×1 speculative layer Final Norm LM Head vocab 155K output
Attention
Sparse Attention
MoE
256 experts · top-8 per token
Layers
78
Hidden size
6144
Context
1M tokens
Parameters
753000M
Active params
40000M

Source: Hugging Face config.json · GlmMoeDsaForCausalLM · model repo

Type: decoder-only Transformer
Attention: IndexShare sparse attention (reuses indexer across every 4 sparse attention layers, 2.9x per-token FLOPs reduction at 1M context)
Decoder: autoregressive
MoE: yes (? experts)
Context length 1M
Extended context 1M
Precision BF16, F32
Indexshare reuses same indexer across every four sparse attention layers
Indexshare Paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12201
Model Size 753B params
Mtp Layer improved MTP for speculative decoding (+20% acceptance length)

Training Pipeline

  1. 1
    pretraining

    Pre-training (~28.5T tokens, GLM-5 series)

    GLM-5 series pre-training corpus (28.5T tokens, per zai-org/GLM-5 GitHub).

  2. 2
    rl

    Post-training for long-horizon tasks

    Post-trained as part of the GLM-5 series with long-horizon task focus (DB training_data_info); flexible thinking-effort levels.

Training & Evaluation Datasets

NameRoleSizeModalitiesCollection
GLM-5 series pre-training corpus (~28.5T tokens) pretraining — —

Trend Analysis

24h Change

+0.4%

7d Change

+5.0%

Current

20,001

huggingface

downloads

-6.5%

huggingface

downloads_all_time

+0.9%

huggingface

likes

+0.0%

ollama

downloads

+0.2%

View raw metric history →

Usage & Social Metrics

SourceMetricValuePeriodRecorded
ollama downloads 337,700 pulls daily 01.09.2026
huggingface downloads_all_time 3,851,617 daily 01.09.2026
huggingface followers 20,001 daily 01.09.2026
huggingface likes 5,065 daily 01.09.2026
huggingface downloads 1,452,214 daily 01.09.2026
ollama downloads 337,100 pulls daily 31.08.2026
huggingface downloads_all_time 3,818,948 daily 31.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,927 daily 31.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,064 daily 31.08.2026
huggingface downloads 1,552,546 daily 31.08.2026
ollama downloads 336,300 pulls daily 30.08.2026
huggingface downloads_all_time 3,798,487 daily 30.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,819 daily 30.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,062 daily 30.08.2026
huggingface downloads 1,861,163 daily 30.08.2026
ollama downloads 335,600 pulls daily 29.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,739 daily 29.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,060 daily 29.08.2026
huggingface downloads 1,832,948 daily 29.08.2026
ollama downloads 334,300 pulls daily 28.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,618 daily 28.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,058 daily 28.08.2026
huggingface downloads 1,903,277 daily 28.08.2026
ollama downloads 333,100 pulls daily 27.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,458 daily 27.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,055 daily 27.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,037,821 daily 27.08.2026
ollama downloads 331,700 pulls daily 26.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,254 daily 26.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,053 daily 26.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,184,066 daily 26.08.2026
ollama downloads 330,200 pulls daily 25.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,044 daily 25.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,049 daily 25.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,420,481 daily 25.08.2026
ollama downloads 329,000 pulls daily 24.08.2026
huggingface followers 19,009 daily 24.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,043 daily 24.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,576,335 daily 24.08.2026
huggingface followers 18,959 daily 23.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,037 daily 23.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,685,029 daily 23.08.2026
huggingface followers 18,923 daily 22.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,024 daily 22.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,715,564 daily 22.08.2026
huggingface followers 18,888 daily 21.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,018 daily 21.08.2026
huggingface downloads 2,768,721 daily 21.08.2026
huggingface followers 18,846 daily 20.08.2026
huggingface likes 5,014 daily 20.08.2026

View full metric history →

Related Models