Parameters
550.0B total / 55.0B active
MoE: total / active
Architecture
Mamba2-Transformer Hybrid Latent Mixture of Experts (LatentMoE) with Multi-Token Prediction (MTP)
Released
03.06.2026
License
OpenMDW License Agreement v1.1
Input Modalities
Output Modalities
Context (native)
262,144 tokens
Context (extended)
1,000,000 tokens
About
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16 (nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16) is a frontier-scale LLM from NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 family (released June 3, 2026), designed for strong agentic, reasoning and conversational capabilities - optimized for complex multi-step agents, long-context analysis, and high-accuracy reasoning over code, math and science. It responds by first generating a reasoning trace and then concluding with a final response; reasoning is configurable through a chat-template flag.
It employs a hybrid Latent Mixture-of-Experts (LatentMoE) architecture - tokens are projected into a smaller latent dimension for expert routing and computation, improving accuracy per byte - with interleaved Mamba-2 and MoE layers plus select Attention layers, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) layers using a shared-weight design across prediction heads (better training signal, native speculative decoding), 550B total / 55B active parameters, and a 262,144-token context extensible to 1M. It is pre-trained for ~20T tokens (crawled + synthetic code, math, science, general knowledge) with an NVFP4 quantization-aware recipe (majority of linear layers NVFP4; latent projections, MTP, QKV/attention and embeddings kept in BF16/MXFP8 for stability), then SFT on synthetic data and RL via asynchronous GRPO. Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Japanese, Hindi, Korean, Brazilian Portuguese, and Chinese; ready for commercial and non-commercial use.
Training Data Pre-trained for approximately 20T tokens using crawled and synthetic code, math, science, and general knowledge data. NVFP4 quantization-aware pre-training recipe. SFT on synthetic code, math, science, tool calling, instruction following, structured outputs. RL via asynchronous GRPO across math, code, science, instruction following, multi-step tool use, multi-turn conversations, and structured output environments.
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Score | Date | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (without web search)
general_agent
|
88.00%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/7
better than 67%
|
|
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2)
coding_agent
|
52.21%
|
04.06.2026 |
#29/44
better than 35%
|
|
CritPt (no tools)
stem_reasoning
|
7.89%
|
04.06.2026 |
#19/21
better than 10%
|
|
Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (with web search)
general_agent
|
27.12%
|
04.06.2026 |
#6/7
better than 17%
|
|
GDPVal
general_agent
|
24.10%
|
04.06.2026 |
#19/20
better than 5%
|
|
IOI 2025
stem_reasoning
|
89.56%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/5
better than 50%
|
|
MMLU-Pro
knowledge
|
86.45%
|
04.06.2026 |
#10/48
better than 81%
|
|
SWE-bench Verified
coding_agent
|
80.62%
|
04.06.2026 |
#37/60
better than 39%
|
|
SWE-bench Multilingual
coding_agent
|
74.20%
|
04.06.2026 |
#30/48
better than 38%
|
|
IMOAnswerBench
stem_reasoning
|
93.75%
|
04.06.2026 |
#7/30
better than 79%
|
|
IMOAnswerBench (with tools)
stem_reasoning
|
92.42%
|
04.06.2026 |
#2/7
better than 83%
|
|
ProfBench (Search)
general_agent
|
71.94%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/7
better than 50%
|
|
OmniScience Accuracy
knowledge
|
42.86%
|
04.06.2026 |
#6/10
better than 44%
|
|
OmniScience Non-Hallucination
knowledge
|
84.21%
|
04.06.2026 |
#2/10
better than 89%
|
|
IFBench (prompt loose)
instruction_following
|
98.46%
|
04.06.2026 |
#2/14
better than 92%
|
|
PinchBench
general_agent
|
90.51%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/9
better than 75%
|
|
TauBench V3 Airline
general_agent
|
59.05%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/7
better than 67%
|
|
TauBench V3 Retail
general_agent
|
56.45%
|
04.06.2026 |
#4/7
better than 50%
|
|
Apex-Shortlist (with tools)
stem_reasoning
|
95.09%
|
04.06.2026 |
#2/7
better than 83%
|
|
Multi-Challenge
instruction_following
|
98.61%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/18
better than 88%
|
|
GPQA Diamond
stem_reasoning
|
86.20%
|
04.06.2026 |
#40/80
better than 49%
|
|
AA-LCR
long_context
|
77.86%
|
04.06.2026 |
#23/42
better than 46%
|
|
TauBench V3 Telecom
general_agent
|
37.93%
|
04.06.2026 |
#6/7
better than 17%
|
|
SciCode (subtask)
stem_reasoning
|
30.58%
|
04.06.2026 |
#11/15
better than 29%
|
|
RULER (1M)
long_context
|
100.00%
|
04.06.2026 |
#1/4
better than 100%
|
|
TauBench V3 Banking
general_agent
|
48.44%
|
04.06.2026 |
#10/17
better than 44%
|
|
Humanity's Last Exam
stem_reasoning
|
46.59%
|
04.06.2026 |
#37/71
better than 49%
|
|
Longbench v2 (≤ 1M)
long_context
|
41.18%
|
04.06.2026 |
#3/4
better than 33%
|
|
TauBench V3 Average
general_agent
|
63.16%
|
04.06.2026 |
#5/7
better than 33%
|
|
WMT24++ (en→xx)
multilingual
|
93.81%
|
04.06.2026 |
#6/17
better than 69%
|
|
HLE (with tools)
stem_reasoning
|
41.89%
|
04.06.2026 |
#38/49
better than 23%
|
|
BrowseComp
general_agent
|
46.40%
|
04.06.2026 |
#30/45
better than 34%
|
|
Apex-Shortlist (no tools)
stem_reasoning
|
75.04%
|
04.06.2026 |
#8/11
better than 30%
|
|
MMLU-ProX
multilingual
|
78.06%
|
04.06.2026 |
#6/19
better than 72%
|
|
SciCode
|
73.52%
|
— |
#5/27
better than 81%
|
|
Terminal Bench 2.1
coding_agent
|
62.08%
|
— |
#29/44
better than 35%
|
|
LiveCodeBench v6
stem_reasoning
|
93.86%
|
04.06.2026 |
#11/49
better than 79%
|
|
AutomationBench (Public)
general_agent
|
8.40
|
— |
#11/11
better than 0%
|
|
DeepSWE 1.1
coding_agent
|
0.20
|
— |
#34/34
better than 0%
|
|
SWE-bench Pro
coding_agent
|
52.29%
|
— |
#52/77
better than 33%
|
|
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard
coding_agent
|
30.70
|
— |
#5/5
better than 0%
|
|
AIME 2025
stem_reasoning
|
91.76%
|
— |
#6/24
better than 78%
|
|
AIME 26
stem_reasoning
|
95.15%
|
— |
#16/45
better than 66%
|
|
HMMT Feb 26
stem_reasoning
|
77.46%
|
— |
#28/44
better than 37%
|
|
StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive)
safety
|
99.59%
|
— |
#2/5
better than 75%
|
|
FORTRESS Benign
safety
|
48.87%
|
— |
#3/5
better than 50%
|
|
AIME 2024
stem_reasoning
|
36.21%
|
— |
#6/7
better than 17%
|
|
MCP-Atlas
general_agent
|
64.75%
|
— |
#39/54
better than 28%
|
|
IFBench
instruction_following
|
95.94%
|
— |
#3/42
better than 95%
|
|
MMLU
knowledge
|
96.14%
|
— |
#4/17
better than 81%
|
What is a good Vals.ai Financial Agent 1.1 (without web search) score? What is a good Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) score? What is a good CritPt (no tools) score?
Hardware Requirements
Estimated VRAM per quantization at 4,096 tokens context — MoE: all experts must fit in VRAM, only 55.0B are active per token
| Quantization | Weights | KV Cache | Total VRAM | On your hardware |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 — 16-bit | 1100.0 GB | 8.5 GB | 1163.5 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT8 — 8-bit | 550.0 GB | 4.3 GB | 581.8 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT4 — 4-bit | 275.0 GB | 2.1 GB | 290.9 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| FP4 — 4-bit | 275.0 GB | 2.1 GB | 290.9 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
Only datacenter GPUs — FP16 needs 1163.5 GB. For consumer hardware, choose the INT4 build with a multi-GPU setup.
Architecture
- Attention
- Hybrid Attention (64:2)
- MoE
- 512 experts · top-22 per token
- Hidden size
- 8192
- Context
- 262K tokens
- RoPE θ
- 10K
- Parameters
- 550000M
- Active params
- 55000M
Source: Hugging Face config.json · NemotronHForCausalLM · model repo
Shared-weight design across prediction heads for speculative decoding
NVFP4 quantization-aware pre-training
Training Pipeline
-
1
pretraining
Pre-Training
Pre-trained for approximately 20T tokens using crawled and synthetic code, math, science, and general knowledge data. Training leveraged an NVFP4 recipe for efficiency. Software: Megatron-LM.
-
2
sft
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
Fine-tuned on synthetic code, math, science, tool calling, instruction following, structured outputs, and general knowledge data. Incorporated data for long-range retrieval and multi-document aggregation. Data Designer used for corpus preparation.
-
3
rl
Reinforcement Learning (RL)
Multi-environment RL using asynchronous GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) across math, code, science, instruction following, multi-step tool use, multi-turn conversations, and structured output environments. Asynchronous RL architecture decoupling training from inference. Conversational quality refined through RLHF. Software: NeMo RL. Environments via NeMo Gym.
Training & Evaluation Datasets
| Name | Role | Size | Modalities | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron Pre-Training Datasets | pretraining | — | text | — |
| Nemotron Post-Training v3 | finetune | — | text | — |
Linked Resources
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra Technical Report
https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-Technical-Report.pdf
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 model family on Hugging Face
https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/nvidia-nemotron-v3
NeMo Evaluator SDK
https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Evaluator
NeMo Gym (RL environments)
https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Gym
NeMo Skills
https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Skills
Harbor (evaluation framework)
https://github.com/harbor-framework/harbor
Megatron-LM (pre-training software)
https://github.com/NVIDIA/Megatron-LM
NeMo RL (reinforcement learning software)
https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/RL
Data Designer (data preparation library)
https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner
Nemotron Pre-Training Datasets
https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/nemotron-pre-training-datasets
Nemotron Post-Training v3
https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/nemotron-post-training-v3
Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-Base-BF16 (base model)
https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-Base-BF16
Trend Analysis
24h Change
+0.9%
7d Change
+5.6%
30d Change
+36.8%
Current
2,922,663
downloads
+0.5%
followers
+0.1%
downloads
-0.8%
likes
+0.0%
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!