Parameters
295.0B total / 21.0B active
MoE: total / active
Architecture
MoE (80 layers + 1 MTP) with GQA (64 heads/8 KV) + QK-Norm, 192 experts top-8 + 1 shared expert, sigmoid router with expert bias
Released
02.07.2026
License
Apache License 2.0
Input Modalities
Output Modalities
Context (native)
262,144 tokens
Context (extended)
262,144 tokens
About
Hy3 (tencent/Hy3, released July 2, 2026 under the Apache License 2.0) is the Tencent Hy Team's 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 21B active parameters plus a 3.8B native MTP layer, introduced after the late-April Hy3 Preview launch with post-training scaled up using feedback from 50+ products. It outperforms similar-size models and rivals flagship open-source models with 2-5x parameters.
Architecture: 80 layers (first dense, then MoE) plus 1 native MTP layer, GQA attention (64 query heads, 8 KV heads, head dim 128) with QK-Norm, 192 routed experts with top-8 activation plus 1 shared expert (sigmoid router with expert bias), hidden size 4096, MoE intermediate size 1536, 256K context, vocabulary 120832, BF16. Hy3 shows solid gains in reasoning, agentic and long-context tasks, and in productivity scenarios (coding, office work, financial modeling, frontend design, game development). In a blind evaluation by 270 experts on real work tasks it scored 2.67/4, outperforming GLM-5.1 at 2.51/4; on SWE-Bench Verified, accuracy variance across scaffoldings (CodeBuddy, Cline, KiloCode) stays within 4%. Product-focused improvements include production-grade tool-call stability, anti-hallucination training (hallucination rate 12.5% -> 5.4%, commonsense errors 25.4% -> 12.7%), and complex multi-turn context retention (issue rate 17.4% -> 7.9%).
Training Data Predecessor of Hy4 preview; scores in the Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (re-evaluated by Tencent under the updated harness).
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Score | Date | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLE (with tools)
stem_reasoning
|
67.74%
|
28.08.2026 |
#25/49
better than 50%
|
|
SWE-bench Pro
coding_agent
|
64.55%
|
28.08.2026 |
#26/77
better than 67%
|
|
DeepSWE
coding_agent
|
38.51%
|
28.08.2026 |
#15/21
better than 30%
|
|
SWE Atlas - QnA
coding_agent
|
39.42%
|
28.08.2026 |
#17/24
better than 30%
|
|
SWE Atlas - TW
coding_agent
|
48.99%
|
28.08.2026 |
#9/20
better than 58%
|
|
SWE Atlas - RF
coding_agent
|
51.35%
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/14
better than 46%
|
|
SWE-Marathon
coding_agent
|
7.89%
|
28.08.2026 |
#15/17
better than 12%
|
|
NL2Repo
coding_agent
|
54.31%
|
28.08.2026 |
#19/41
better than 55%
|
|
Cybergym
general_agent
|
26.52%
|
28.08.2026 |
#16/17
better than 6%
|
|
ProgramBench
coding_agent
|
3.00
|
28.08.2026 |
#18/18
better than 0%
|
|
PostTrainBench
coding_agent
|
4.78%
|
28.08.2026 |
#21/22
better than 5%
|
|
Hy-Backend 2.0 (Internal)
coding_agent
|
26.20
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
Hy-SWE Max Verified (Internal)
coding_agent
|
49.00
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
WideSearch
general_agent
|
91.39%
|
28.08.2026 |
#5/24
better than 78%
|
|
$OneMillion-Bench
general_capabilities
|
36.88%
|
28.08.2026 |
#9/11
better than 20%
|
|
Hy-LifeSearch (Internal)
general_agent
|
38.90
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
Hy-BrowseComp-Pro2 (Internal)
general_agent
|
57.43%
|
28.08.2026 |
#5/8
better than 43%
|
|
OfficeQA Pro
general_agent
|
73.02%
|
28.08.2026 |
#10/14
better than 31%
|
|
MCP-Atlas
general_agent
|
81.46%
|
28.08.2026 |
#18/54
better than 68%
|
|
Toolathlon Verified
general_agent
|
56.69%
|
28.08.2026 |
#19/35
better than 47%
|
|
SkillsBench Avg5
coding_agent
|
81.70%
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/16
better than 60%
|
|
JobBench
general_agent
|
27.71%
|
28.08.2026 |
#15/19
better than 22%
|
|
Agents' Last Exam
general_agent
|
19.94%
|
28.08.2026 |
#24/29
better than 18%
|
|
GDPVal-AA v2
general_agent
|
66.25%
|
28.08.2026 |
#25/38
better than 35%
|
|
Automation-Bench
general_agent
|
10.19%
|
28.08.2026 |
#23/27
better than 15%
|
|
BankerToolBench
general_agent
|
27.22%
|
28.08.2026 |
#13/15
better than 14%
|
|
E-Bench (Internal)
general_agent
|
48.50
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
E-Bench-Code (Internal)
coding_agent
|
0.53%
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/8
better than 14%
|
|
Hy-FinAgentBench (Internal)
domain_finance
|
69.50
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
BioMysteryBench
stem_reasoning
|
54.90
|
28.08.2026 |
#10/10
better than 0%
|
|
CritPt (no tools)
stem_reasoning
|
13.56%
|
28.08.2026 |
#16/21
better than 25%
|
|
GPQA Diamond
stem_reasoning
|
93.57%
|
28.08.2026 |
#23/80
better than 71%
|
|
Humanity's Last Exam
stem_reasoning
|
61.17%
|
28.08.2026 |
#31/71
better than 57%
|
|
ArXivMath
stem_reasoning
|
51.70
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/7
better than 0%
|
|
HorizonMath (pass@4)
stem_reasoning
|
3.50
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/7
better than 0%
|
|
MathArena Apex 2025
stem_reasoning
|
38.70
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
BrokenArXiv
stem_reasoning
|
26.70
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/7
better than 0%
|
|
WorkSpaceBench
general_agent
|
58.20
|
28.08.2026 |
#11/11
better than 0%
|
|
Hy-FinmodelBench v2 (Internal)
domain_finance
|
28.60
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
DRACO
general_agent
|
65.20
|
28.08.2026 |
#12/12
better than 0%
|
|
SUPERChem
stem_reasoning
|
52.60
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
|
Harbor-Index
coding_agent
|
15.60
|
28.08.2026 |
#7/7
better than 0%
|
|
SWE-bench Multilingual
coding_agent
|
83.79%
|
28.08.2026 |
#16/48
better than 66%
|
|
Apex-Agents
general_agent
|
29.28%
|
28.08.2026 |
#21/24
better than 13%
|
|
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2)
coding_agent
|
73.45%
|
28.08.2026 |
#18/44
better than 58%
|
|
Hy-CompanyBench V2 (Internal)
general_agent
|
29.80
|
28.08.2026 |
#8/8
better than 0%
|
What is a good HLE (with tools) score? What is a good SWE-bench Pro score? What is a good DeepSWE score?
Hardware Requirements
Estimated VRAM per quantization at 4,096 tokens context — MoE: all experts must fit in VRAM, only 21.0B are active per token
| Quantization | Weights | KV Cache | Total VRAM | On your hardware |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 — 16-bit | 590.0 GB | 3.3 GB | 622.8 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT8 — 8-bit | 295.0 GB | 1.6 GB | 311.4 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT4 — 4-bit | 147.5 GB | 0.8 GB | 155.7 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| FP4 — 4-bit | 147.5 GB | 0.8 GB | 155.7 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
Only datacenter GPUs — FP16 needs 622.8 GB. For consumer hardware, choose the INT4 build with a multi-GPU setup.
Architecture
- Attention
- Grouped Query Attention (64:8)
- MoE
- 192 experts · top-8 per token
- Layers
- 80
- Hidden size
- 4096
- Context
- 262K tokens
- Parameters
- 295000M
- Active params
- 21000M
Source: Hugging Face config.json · HYV3ForCausalLM · model repo
Training Pipeline
-
2
sft
SFT stage
Post-training SFT with higher quality and more diverse data scaled from 50+ products feedback; joint SFT+RL optimization for multi-turn context retention
-
3
rl
RL stage
Scaled-up RL (GRPO with verl, Megatron-LM training, vLLM rollout) across reasoning, agentic and long-context tasks
Trend Analysis
24h Change
-2.7%
7d Change
-12.2%
Current
1,070,485
downloads_all_time
+0.9%
followers
+0.1%
likes
+0.0%
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!