Parameters
4.0B
Architecture
Causal Language Model with Vision Encoder - Hybrid Gated Delta Networks + Gated Attention (dense FFN)
Released
27.02.2026
License
Apache License 2.0
Input Modalities
Output Modalities
Context (native)
262,144 tokens
Context (extended)
1,010,000 tokens
About
Qwen3.5-4B (Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B) is the small dense member of Alibaba's Qwen3.5 generation - a unified vision-language foundation model with 4B parameters handling text, image and video input in 201 languages and dialects, trained with Early fusion (multimodal pre-training) on multimodal tokens and post-trained with RL scaled across million-agent RL environments.
Its 32-layer hybrid layout repeats 8x (3x (Gated DeltaNet -> FFN) + 1x (Gated Attention -> FFN)): 24 linear-attention layers (Gated DeltaNet with 32 V / 16 QK heads, head dim 128) and 8 full-attention layers (Gated Attention with 16 Q / 4 KV heads, head dim 256, RoPE dim 64), with hidden size 2560, dense FFN 9216 (no MoE), 248K vocabulary tied to token embeddings, and Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) trained with multi-steps. Context is 262,144 tokens natively, extensible up to 1,010,000 tokens.
As a Qwen3.5 family member it delivers the generation's agentic capabilities (native function calling, thinking-mode control via enable_thinking) in a single-GPU-sized package, outperforming much larger Qwen3-VL models across reasoning, coding, agents and visual understanding. Released February 27, 2026 under Apache 2.0.
Training Data Pre-trained on multimodal tokens with early fusion. Post-trained with RL across million-agent environments. 201 languages and dialects.
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Score | Date | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LVBench
video_understanding
|
71.19%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/12
better than 36%
|
|
ScreenSpot Pro
general_agent
|
60.40%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/11
better than 20%
|
|
OSWorld-Verified
general_agent
|
35.60
|
01.02.2026 |
#25/25
better than 0%
|
|
AndroidWorld
general_agent
|
58.60
|
01.02.2026 |
#13/13
better than 0%
|
|
TIR-Bench
vision_language
|
40.62%
|
01.02.2026 |
#4/8
better than 57%
|
|
V-Star
vision_language
|
64.57%
|
01.02.2026 |
#15/20
better than 26%
|
|
SLAKE
vision_language
|
79.55%
|
01.02.2026 |
#4/8
better than 57%
|
|
PMC-VQA
vision_language
|
71.11%
|
01.02.2026 |
#5/8
better than 43%
|
|
MedXpertQA-MM
vision_language
|
44.29%
|
01.02.2026 |
#10/13
better than 25%
|
|
ParseBench Mean
document_understanding
|
35.40
|
01.02.2026 |
#3/3
better than 0%
|
|
ParseBench Text Content
document_understanding
|
88.90
|
01.02.2026 |
#3/3
better than 0%
|
|
ParseBench Text Formatting
document_understanding
|
57.80
|
01.02.2026 |
#3/3
better than 0%
|
|
Ifstruct V1
instruction_following
|
36.25
|
01.02.2026 |
#3/3
better than 0%
|
|
MMLU-ProX
multilingual
|
3.87%
|
01.02.2026 |
#18/19
better than 6%
|
|
NOVA-63
multilingual
|
35.82%
|
01.02.2026 |
#5/6
better than 20%
|
|
INCLUDE
multilingual
|
71.00
|
01.02.2026 |
#11/11
better than 0%
|
|
OmniDocBench 1.5
document_understanding
|
94.09%
|
01.02.2026 |
#14/26
better than 48%
|
|
Global PIQA
multilingual
|
78.90
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/6
better than 0%
|
|
CharXiv (RQ)
document_understanding
|
18.97%
|
01.02.2026 |
#22/34
better than 36%
|
|
PolyMATH
multilingual
|
25.28%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/11
better than 30%
|
|
MMLongBench-Doc
document_understanding
|
39.39%
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/7
better than 17%
|
|
WMT24++ (en→xx)
multilingual
|
59.68%
|
01.02.2026 |
#13/17
better than 25%
|
|
CC-OCR
document_understanding
|
61.87%
|
01.02.2026 |
#10/14
better than 31%
|
|
MAXIFE
multilingual
|
78.00
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/6
better than 0%
|
|
MMMU
vision_language
|
83.84%
|
01.02.2026 |
#14/19
better than 28%
|
|
MathVision
vision_language
|
55.21%
|
01.02.2026 |
#16/27
better than 35%
|
|
CountBench
spatial_intelligence
|
80.77%
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/13
better than 58%
|
|
We-Math
vision_language
|
100.00%
|
01.02.2026 |
#1/2
better than 100%
|
|
RefSpatialBench
spatial_intelligence
|
77.29%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/12
better than 36%
|
|
ZEROBench
vision_language
|
3.00
|
01.02.2026 |
#13/14
better than 0%
|
|
LingoQA
spatial_intelligence
|
89.02%
|
01.02.2026 |
#4/8
better than 57%
|
|
ZEROBench_sub
vision_language
|
2.94%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/11
better than 10%
|
|
Hypersim
spatial_intelligence
|
71.43%
|
01.02.2026 |
#4/6
better than 40%
|
|
VlmsAreBlind
vision_language
|
79.25%
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/11
better than 50%
|
|
Nuscene
spatial_intelligence
|
9.90
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/6
better than 0%
|
|
RealWorldQA
vision_language
|
79.07%
|
01.02.2026 |
#12/23
better than 50%
|
|
MMStar
vision_language
|
80.45%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/16
better than 47%
|
|
MMLU-Pro
knowledge
|
61.61%
|
01.02.2026 |
#29/48
better than 40%
|
|
MMLU-Redux
knowledge
|
71.43%
|
01.02.2026 |
#20/30
better than 34%
|
|
SuperGPQA
knowledge
|
60.14%
|
01.02.2026 |
#17/28
better than 41%
|
|
GPQA Diamond
stem_reasoning
|
65.78%
|
01.02.2026 |
#63/80
better than 22%
|
|
IFEval
instruction_following
|
88.78%
|
01.02.2026 |
#14/26
better than 44%
|
|
Multi-Challenge
instruction_following
|
30.09%
|
01.02.2026 |
#17/18
better than 6%
|
|
LongBench v2
long_context
|
56.79%
|
01.02.2026 |
#11/22
better than 52%
|
|
HMMT Feb 25
stem_reasoning
|
53.78%
|
01.02.2026 |
#12/17
better than 31%
|
|
HMMT Nov 25
stem_reasoning
|
76.80
|
01.02.2026 |
#20/20
better than 0%
|
|
LiveCodeBench v6
stem_reasoning
|
48.57%
|
01.02.2026 |
#41/49
better than 17%
|
|
OJBench
stem_reasoning
|
31.57%
|
01.02.2026 |
#13/22
better than 43%
|
|
BFCL-V4
general_agent
|
47.63%
|
01.02.2026 |
#20/27
better than 27%
|
|
TAU2-Bench
general_agent
|
78.77%
|
01.02.2026 |
#4/21
better than 85%
|
|
VITA-Bench
general_agent
|
45.60%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/16
better than 47%
|
|
DeepPlanning
general_agent
|
2.97%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/10
better than 22%
|
|
MMMLU
multilingual
|
37.99%
|
01.02.2026 |
#17/20
better than 16%
|
|
HallusionBench
vision_language
|
41.80%
|
01.02.2026 |
#11/13
better than 17%
|
|
MMMU-Pro
vision_language
|
69.15%
|
01.02.2026 |
#29/35
better than 18%
|
|
TAU3-Bench
general_agent
|
8.12%
|
— |
#17/21
better than 20%
|
|
Workspace Bench
|
57.87%
|
— |
#3/5
better than 50%
|
|
BrowseComp
general_agent
|
12.58%
|
— |
#37/45
better than 18%
|
|
SWE-bench Pro
coding_agent
|
32.78%
|
— |
#65/77
better than 16%
|
|
SWE-bench Verified
coding_agent
|
44.04%
|
— |
#51/60
better than 15%
|
|
SWE-bench Multilingual
coding_agent
|
26.86%
|
— |
#44/48
better than 9%
|
|
Gaokao 2026
|
90.32%
|
— |
#4/8
better than 57%
|
|
AIME 26
stem_reasoning
|
79.34%
|
— |
#36/45
better than 20%
|
|
HMMT Feb 26
stem_reasoning
|
63.73%
|
— |
#34/44
better than 23%
|
|
IMOAnswerBench
stem_reasoning
|
65.20%
|
— |
#25/30
better than 17%
|
|
Humanity's Last Exam
stem_reasoning
|
12.31%
|
— |
#61/71
better than 14%
|
|
GPQA
reasoning
|
83.92%
|
— |
#6/14
better than 62%
|
|
Multi-IF
instruction_following
|
68.24%
|
— |
#6/13
better than 58%
|
|
Terminal Bench 2.1
coding_agent
|
28.16%
|
— |
#35/44
better than 21%
|
|
BrowseComp-zh
general_agent
|
54.50%
|
— |
#6/13
better than 58%
|
|
Gaia2
general_agent
|
83.76%
|
— |
#2/12
better than 91%
|
|
NoLiMa
long_context
|
63.61%
|
— |
#2/9
better than 88%
|
|
GDPVal-AA v2
general_agent
|
0.64%
|
— |
#31/38
better than 19%
|
|
Claw-Eval Avg
coding_agent
|
61.36%
|
— |
#31/40
better than 23%
|
|
WildClawBench
coding_agent
|
18.38%
|
— |
#14/20
better than 32%
|
|
LCB-Pro 25Q2 (Easy)
stem_reasoning
|
83.19%
|
— |
#2/9
better than 88%
|
|
LCB-Pro 25Q2 (Medium)
stem_reasoning
|
40.00%
|
— |
#2/9
better than 88%
|
|
MATH-500
math
|
100.00%
|
— |
#1/11
better than 100%
|
|
C-Eval
knowledge
|
26.61%
|
01.02.2026 |
#12/15
better than 21%
|
|
AI2D_TEST
document_understanding
|
87.71%
|
01.02.2026 |
#5/15
better than 71%
|
|
MCPMark
general_agent
|
11.06%
|
— |
#14/15
better than 7%
|
|
DynaMath
vision_language
|
50.56%
|
01.02.2026 |
#6/14
better than 62%
|
|
QwenClawBench
coding_agent
|
66.67%
|
— |
#10/17
better than 44%
|
|
LongBenchPro
long_context
|
89.17%
|
— |
#2/10
better than 89%
|
|
AIME 2025
stem_reasoning
|
69.89%
|
— |
#15/24
better than 39%
|
|
SciCode
|
34.29%
|
— |
#21/27
better than 23%
|
|
MCP-Atlas
general_agent
|
36.81%
|
— |
#48/54
better than 11%
|
|
RefCOCO (avg)
spatial_intelligence
|
76.78%
|
01.02.2026 |
#10/11
better than 10%
|
|
MMBench EN-DEV v1.1
vision_language
|
82.22%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/15
better than 43%
|
|
MMVU
video_understanding
|
41.10%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/10
better than 11%
|
|
VideoMME (w sub.)
video_understanding
|
69.05%
|
01.02.2026 |
#13/17
better than 19%
|
|
SimpleVQA
vision_language
|
19.03%
|
01.02.2026 |
#15/16
better than 7%
|
|
MLVU
video_understanding
|
71.88%
|
01.02.2026 |
#10/13
better than 25%
|
|
ERQA
spatial_intelligence
|
45.86%
|
01.02.2026 |
#11/21
better than 45%
|
|
OCRBench
document_understanding
|
1.15%
|
01.02.2026 |
#10/12
better than 18%
|
|
IFBench
instruction_following
|
59.35%
|
01.02.2026 |
#35/42
better than 17%
|
|
VideoMMMU
video_understanding
|
63.97%
|
01.02.2026 |
#18/19
better than 6%
|
|
AA-LCR
long_context
|
67.86%
|
01.02.2026 |
#31/42
better than 27%
|
|
MathVista (mini)
vision_language
|
89.33%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/14
better than 46%
|
|
VideoMME (w/o sub.)
video_understanding
|
73.28%
|
01.02.2026 |
#8/11
better than 30%
|
|
EmbSpatialBench
spatial_intelligence
|
76.51%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/12
better than 27%
|
|
MVBench
video_understanding
|
67.30%
|
01.02.2026 |
#9/12
better than 27%
|
|
BabyVision
vision_language
|
4.17%
|
01.02.2026 |
#22/24
better than 9%
|
What is a good LVBench score? What is a good ScreenSpot Pro score? What is a good OSWorld-Verified score?
Hardware Requirements
Estimated VRAM per quantization at 4,096 tokens context
| Quantization | Weights | KV Cache | Total VRAM | On your hardware |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 — 16-bit | 8.0 GB | 0.6 GB | 9.0 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT8 — 8-bit | 4.0 GB | 0.3 GB | 4.5 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| INT4 — 4-bit | 2.0 GB | 0.2 GB | 2.3 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
| FP4 — 4-bit | 2.0 GB | 0.2 GB | 2.3 GB | Which GPUs can run it? Calculate on your GPU |
Consumer GPUs that fit this model with a single card (INT4):
Architecture
- Attention
- Hybrid Attention (16:4)
- Layers
- 32
- Hidden size
- 2560
- Context
- 262K tokens
- Parameters
- 4000M
Source: Hugging Face config.json · Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration · exact layer pattern · model repo
248K
tied to token embedding
248K
padded
Training Pipeline
-
1
pretraining
Pre-training with Multimodal Early Fusion
Pre-training on multimodal tokens with early fusion. Near-100% multimodal training efficiency compared to text-only training. 201 languages and dialects supported.
-
2
rl
Reinforcement Learning Post-training
Post-training with reinforcement learning scaled across million-agent environments with progressively complex task distributions for robust real-world adaptability. Asynchronous RL frameworks supporting massive-scale agent scaffolds and environment orchestration.
-
3
other
Post-training (Thinking + Instruct Modes)
Post-training stage producing the final model weights compatible with Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, KTransformers. Includes thinking mode and instruct mode capabilities.
Training & Evaluation Datasets
| Name | Role | Size | Modalities | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early-fusion multimodal token corpus (text + image) | pretraining | — | — | |
| Million-agent RL task environments | rl | — | — |
Linked Resources
Qwen3.5 Blog Post
https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5
Qwen-Agent
https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen-Agent
Qwen Code
https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code
Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents
https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5
Qwen Chat
https://chat.qwen.ai/
Qwen3.5 Collection
https://huggingface.co/collections/Qwen/qwen35
Trend Analysis
24h Change
+0.5%
7d Change
+2.4%
30d Change
+13.3%
Current
1,226
followers
+0.2%
downloads
-1.2%
downloads
+0.4%
downloads_all_time
+0.2%
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!