DRACO
Category
General Agents
Score type
percent
Scale
100%
higher is better
Models tested
6
What is DRACO?
DRACO is a benchmark for how well a model acts as a general-purpose agent. It was built to compare language models on a clearly defined set of tasks under the same grading rules, so scores are directly comparable between models.
What does it test?
DRACO measures how well a model acts as a general-purpose agent. In detail, it checks:
- solving long, multi-step tasks with many intermediate decisions
- using tools correctly (browsers, terminals, APIs, calendars, other apps)
- adapting when something unexpected happens mid-task
- staying on goal over long task horizons instead of wandering off
How to read the score
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better.
Frequently asked questions
What is the DRACO benchmark?
DRACO is a benchmark for how well a model acts as a general-purpose agent. It was built to compare language models on a clearly defined set of tasks under the same grading rules, so scores are directly comparable between models.
What does DRACO test?
DRACO mainly measures how well a model acts as a general-purpose agent. Concretely, it checks: solving long, multi-step tasks with many intermediate decisions; using tools correctly (browsers, terminals, APIs, calendars, other apps); adapting when something unexpected happens mid-task.
How is the DRACO score calculated?
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better. The declared maximum score of this benchmark is 100.0.
Where do I get DRACO data and scores?
The official benchmark page/reference is linked on this page. Every score on Open LLM Radar is also available as open data: download the scores JSON (http://open-llm-radar-api:8000/api/v1/benchmarks/draco/scores) or pull it directly from the Open LLM Radar API with any HTTP client.
Benchmark data & downloads
Where to get, inspect and reuse the data behind this benchmark.
Model scores 6 models tested
| # | Model | Score | Date | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
GLM-5.3
Zhipu AI
|
78.1%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) (Tencent rerun) | Verified |
| 2 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
77.5%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) (Tencent rerun) | Verified |
| 3 |
Hy4 preview
Tencent
|
77.2%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) | Verified |
| 4 |
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
Qwen
|
76.4%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) (Tencent rerun) | Verified |
| 5 |
MiniMax-M3
MiniMaxAI
|
73.2%
|
11.06.2026 | MiniMax-M3 model card benchmark table | Unverified |
| 6 |
Hy3
Tencent
|
65.2%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) | Verified |