Multi-IF
Multi-IF - multi-turn instruction following benchmark evaluating complex multi-constraint instruction adherence.
Category
Instruction Following
Score type
percent
Scale
100%
higher is better
Models tested
13
What is Multi-IF?
Multi-IF is a benchmark for how precisely a model obeys the instructions it was given. The official description says: "Multi-IF - multi-turn instruction following benchmark evaluating complex multi-constraint instruction adherence". Below we describe in simple words what benchmarks of this type generally examine.
What does it test?
Multi-IF measures how precisely a model obeys the instructions it was given. In detail, it checks:
- meeting verifiable constraints (length, format, language, layout)
- following several constraints correctly at once
- keeping the constraints over long, multi-turn conversations
- not ignoring parts of the instruction while sounding plausible
How to read the score
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better.
Official methodology note: Multi-IF - multi-turn instruction following benchmark evaluating complex multi-constraint instruction adherence.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Multi-IF benchmark?
Multi-IF is a benchmark for how precisely a model obeys the instructions it was given. The official description says: 'Multi-IF - multi-turn instruction following benchmark evaluating complex multi-constraint instruction adherence'. Below we describe in simple words what benchmarks of this type generally examine.
What does Multi-IF test?
Multi-IF mainly measures how precisely a model obeys the instructions it was given. Concretely, it checks: meeting verifiable constraints (length, format, language, layout); following several constraints correctly at once; keeping the constraints over long, multi-turn conversations.
How is the Multi-IF score calculated?
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better. The declared maximum score of this benchmark is 100.0.
Where do I get Multi-IF data and scores?
The official benchmark page/reference is linked on this page. Every score on Open LLM Radar is also available as open data: download the scores JSON (http://open-llm-radar-api:8000/api/v1/benchmarks/multi-if/scores) or pull it directly from the Open LLM Radar API with any HTTP client.
Benchmark data & downloads
Where to get, inspect and reuse the data behind this benchmark.
Benchmark dataset
The question/task data itself — download and evaluate locally
Benchmark metadata (JSON)
This page's benchmark record from the Open LLM Radar API
All model scores (JSON download)
Full score table as JSON; paginate with limit/offset params
Open LLM Radar API docs
Swagger UI to explore and reuse all radar API endpoints
Model scores 13 models tested
| # | Model | Score | Date | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
LFM3-1.7B
LiquidAI
|
89.1%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 2 |
LFM2.5-24B-A2B
LiquidAI
|
84.38%
|
13.10.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 3 |
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen
|
77.8%
|
10.09.2025 | Report | Verified |
| 4 |
LFM2.5-2.6B
LiquidAI
|
76.8%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 5 |
granite-4.2-3B
IBM
|
75.9%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 6 |
Qwen3.5-4B
Qwen
|
73.6%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 7 |
MiniCPM5-2B
OpenBMB
|
71.8%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 8 |
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
LiquidAI
|
71.4%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 9 |
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B
Qwen
|
66.1%
|
04.10.2025 | Report | Verified |
| 10 |
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B
NVIDIA
|
65.9%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 11 |
Qwen3.5-2B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
57.1%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 12 |
Gemma4-E4B
Google
|
45.9%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 13 |
Gemma4-E2B
Google
|
40.3%
|
— | Report | Verified |