SWE-bench Pro
SWE-bench Pro - refined benchmark with corrected problematic tasks in the public set. Internal agent scaffold; temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, 200K context window.
Category
Agentic Coding
Score type
percent
Scale
100%
higher is better
Models tested
47
What is SWE-bench Pro?
SWE-bench Pro is a harder, cleaned-up variant of SWE-bench: the task set was revised to remove flawed tasks from the original collection so scores are less distorted. As with SWE-bench Verified, an agent solves real GitHub issues from real repositories under defined conditions (temperature and context window are fixed).
What does it test?
SWE-bench Pro measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. In detail, it checks:
- real bug fixing across multiple programming languages
- large, realistic code repositories instead of toy projects
- correct multi-file, multi-step changes by an autonomous agent
- clean task definitions without ambiguous or broken test setups
How to read the score
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better.
Frequently asked questions
What is the SWE-bench Pro benchmark?
SWE-bench Pro is a harder, cleaned-up variant of SWE-bench: the task set was revised to remove flawed tasks from the original collection so scores are less distorted. As with SWE-bench Verified, an agent solves real GitHub issues from real repositories under defined conditions (temperature and context window are fixed).
What does SWE-bench Pro test?
SWE-bench Pro mainly measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. Concretely, it checks: real bug fixing across multiple programming languages; large, realistic code repositories instead of toy projects; correct multi-file, multi-step changes by an autonomous agent.
How is the SWE-bench Pro score calculated?
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better. The declared maximum score of this benchmark is 100.0.
Where do I get SWE-bench Pro data and scores?
The official source is https://huggingface.co/datasets/ScaleAI/SWE-bench_Pro. The official benchmark page/reference is linked on this page. Every score on Open LLM Radar is also available as open data: download the scores JSON (http://open-llm-radar-api:8000/api/v1/benchmarks/swe-bench-pro/scores) or pull it directly from the Open LLM Radar API with any HTTP client.
Benchmark data & downloads
Where to get, inspect and reuse the data behind this benchmark.
Official benchmark page / paper
The benchmark maintainer's website, paper or leaderboard
Benchmark dataset
The question/task data itself — download and evaluate locally
Benchmark metadata (JSON)
This page's benchmark record from the Open LLM Radar API
All model scores (JSON download)
Full score table as JSON; paginate with limit/offset params
Open LLM Radar API docs
Swagger UI to explore and reuse all radar API endpoints
Model scores 47 models tested
| # | Model | Score | Date | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Flint-40B-A2.5B
Recursive
|
89.7%
|
— | HF card https://huggingface.co/RecursiveSI/flint - card writes SWE-bench Pro v2, matched to DB benchmark SWE-bench Pro - mini-swe-agent harness, temp 1.0, top-p 0.95, top-k 20; avg pass@1 over 5+ attempts; measured by Recursive | Verified |
| 2 |
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
Qwen
|
67.7%
|
18.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 3 |
Hy4 preview
Tencent
|
65.7%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) | Verified |
| 4 |
GLM-5.3
Zhipu AI
|
64.6%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) (Tencent rerun) | Verified |
| 5 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
63.3%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) (Tencent rerun) | Verified |
| 6 |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen Team (Alibaba)
|
62.5%
|
26.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 7 |
GLM-5.2
Zhipu AI
|
62.1%
|
17.06.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 8 |
Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
61.7%
|
18.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 9 |
Ripple-65B Preview
Ricursive Intelligence
|
61.42%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 10 |
Nanbeige4.3-33B
Nanbeige
|
60.3%
|
24.10.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 11 |
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith AI
|
59.6%
|
19.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 12 |
MiniMax-M3
MiniMaxAI
|
59%
|
11.06.2026 | MiniMax-M3 official evaluation metadata | Verified |
| 13 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
58.6%
|
11.06.2026 | MiniMax-M3 model card benchmark table | Unverified |
| 14 |
Muse-Spark-Open-816B-A42B
Meta Superintelligence Lab
|
58.2%
|
— | Report | Unverified |
| 15 |
Hy3
Tencent
|
57.9%
|
28.08.2026 | Tencent Hy4 preview model card benchmark appendix (https://huggingface.co/tencent/Hy4-preview#benchmark-appendix) | Verified |
| 16 |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
DeepSeek
|
56%
|
26.08.2026 | Report | Unverified |
| 17 |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek
|
55.4%
|
17.06.2026 | Report | Unverified |
| 18 |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek
|
55.4%
|
26.06.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 19 |
Spark-X2.6-4B
SparkLLM (XHToken)
|
54.3%
|
21.10.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 20 |
Qwen3.6-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
53.5%
|
22.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 21 |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeepSeek
|
52.6%
|
26.06.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 22 |
Muse-Glimmer-30B
Meta Superintelligence Lab
|
51.2%
|
01.08.2026 | Meta Superintelligence Lab (official model card) | Verified |
| 23 |
Qwen3.5-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
51.2%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 24 |
Ornith-1.0-35B
DeepReinforce AI
|
50.4%
|
25.06.2026 | DeepReinforce Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 25 |
Ornith-1.0-35B-A3B
Ornith AI
|
50.4%
|
19.08.2026 | Report | Unverified |