SWE-bench Verified
SWE-bench Verified evaluates LLM-based agents on real-world GitHub issue resolution from popular Python repositories. Internal agent scaffold (bash + file-edit tools); temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, 200K context window.
Category
Agentic Coding
Score type
percent
Scale
100%
higher is better
Models tested
42
What is SWE-bench Verified?
SWE-bench Verified is a benchmark in which a model has to fix real software bugs in popular open-source Python projects. The model gets a GitHub issue and the repository, and must change the code itself until the automated tests pass. The tasks were reviewed by OpenAI engineers, so a task is only in the set when it is clearly reproducible and solvable.
What does it test?
SWE-bench Verified measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. In detail, it checks:
- finding the right file(s) in a large real codebase
- writing a fix that solves the described issue
- making sure the project's existing tests still pass
- working autonomously with terminal and file-editing tools
How to read the score
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better.
Frequently asked questions
What is the SWE-bench Verified benchmark?
SWE-bench Verified is a benchmark in which a model has to fix real software bugs in popular open-source Python projects. The model gets a GitHub issue and the repository, and must change the code itself until the automated tests pass. The tasks were reviewed by OpenAI engineers, so a task is only in the set when it is clearly reproducible and solvable.
What does SWE-bench Verified test?
SWE-bench Verified mainly measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. Concretely, it checks: finding the right file(s) in a large real codebase; writing a fix that solves the described issue; making sure the project's existing tests still pass.
How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better. The declared maximum score of this benchmark is 100.0.
Where do I get SWE-bench Verified data and scores?
The official source is https://www.swebench.com/. The official benchmark page/reference is linked on this page. Every score on Open LLM Radar is also available as open data: download the scores JSON (http://open-llm-radar-api:8000/api/v1/benchmarks/swe-bench-verified/scores) or pull it directly from the Open LLM Radar API with any HTTP client.
Benchmark data & downloads
Where to get, inspect and reuse the data behind this benchmark.
Official benchmark page / paper
The benchmark maintainer's website, paper or leaderboard
Benchmark dataset
The question/task data itself — download and evaluate locally
Benchmark metadata (JSON)
This page's benchmark record from the Open LLM Radar API
All model scores (JSON download)
Full score table as JSON; paginate with limit/offset params
Open LLM Radar API docs
Swagger UI to explore and reuse all radar API endpoints
Model scores 42 models tested
| # | Model | Score | Date | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 |
GPT-OSS-120B
OpenAI
|
62.4%
|
08.08.2025 | Report | Verified |
| 27 |
GPT-OSS-20B
OpenAI
|
60.7%
|
05.08.2025 | Report | Verified |
| 28 |
Gemma4-31B-it
Google
|
52%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 29 |
Gemma-4-31B
Google
|
52%
|
19.08.2026 | Report | Unverified |
| 30 |
MiniCPM5-2B
OpenBMB
|
46.4%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 31 |
Gemma4-12B
Google
|
44.2%
|
25.06.2026 | DeepReinforce Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 32 |
Spark-X2.5-4B
SparkLLM (XHToken)
|
41.6%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 33 |
Qwen3.5-4B
Qwen
|
38.8%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 34 |
granite-4.2-3B
IBM
|
36.8%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 35 |
Spark-X2.5-1.7B
SparkLLM (XHToken)
|
28.3%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 36 |
Gemma4-26B-A4B
Google
|
17.4%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison); KRAFTON re-eval (Raon-1-mini-preview card, gpt-5.6-luna harness): 61.6 | Unverified |
| 37 |
Gemma4-E4B
Google
|
14%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 38 |
Qwen3.5-2B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
6.8%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 39 |
LFM2.5-2.6B
LiquidAI
|
6%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 40 |
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B
NVIDIA
|
3%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 41 |
Gemma4-E2B
Google
|
2%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 42 |
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
LiquidAI
|
0.4%
|
— | Report | Verified |