LLM Model Comparisons

Every comparison computes an overall 0–100 score from benchmark wins, category strengths and coverage — so the winner is visible on each card, even when the models share only a few benchmarks.

New Comparison
Reset

21 comparisons

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro +5 more

Winner Claude Opus 5 74.2 57.3 57.1 46.2 42.2 37.4 0 0

Claude Opus 5 scores higher overall across category strength profiles (74 vs 57 for DeepSeek V4 Pro); only 0 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Mistral AI, Ricursive Intelligence, deep-principle, sensenova · Generated: 12.11.2026

Flint-40B-A2.5B vs Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Winner Flint-40B-A2.5B 62.9 62.6 57.7

Flint-40B-A2.5B scores higher overall across category strength profiles (63 vs 63 for Qwen3.8-27B); only 1 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud), Qwen Team (Alibaba), Recursive · Generated: 11.11.2026

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Winner Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 85.6 66.7 27.2

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B wins this comparison with an overall score of 86 vs 67 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, leading 18 of 22 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 11.11.2026

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Winner Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 84.2 63.2 24.6

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B wins this comparison with an overall score of 84 vs 63 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 14 of 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 11.11.2026

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B +4 more

Winner Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 57.7 52.4 51.1 48.2 44 39.6 20.4

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins this comparison with an overall score of 58 vs 52 for Qwen3.5-27B, leading 3 of 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud), Qwen Team (Alibaba) · Generated: 11.11.2026

Bonsai 2 27B — GGUF vs Claude 4.5 Opus vs Claude Opus 4.6 +12 more

Winner Claude Opus 5 60.4 52.4 49 47.1 46.7 44.7 39.1 36.1 33.3 32.7 31.4 31 30.9 28.3 24.2

Claude Opus 5 scores higher overall across category strength profiles (60 vs 52 for Claude Opus 4.8); only 0 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Anthropic, Cloudflare, DeepSeek, LiquidAI, Prism ML · Generated: 08.11.2026

Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 83.9 63

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 84 vs 63 for Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B, leading 6 of 9 shared benchmarks.

Ornith AI, Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 07.11.2026

Bonsai 2 27B — GGUF vs Claude 4.5 Opus

Winner Bonsai 2 27B — GGUF 75.2 70.8

Bonsai 2 27B — GGUF wins this comparison with an overall score of 75 vs 71 for Claude 4.5 Opus, leading 3 of 4 shared benchmarks.

Anthropic, Prism ML · Generated: 01.11.2026

Qwen3.8-27B vs Raon-1 mini

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 92.3 52.6

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 92 vs 53 for Raon-1 mini, leading 14 of 18 shared benchmarks.

KRAFTON AI, Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 27.10.2026

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 87.4 56

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 87 vs 56 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 30 of 32 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 23.09.2026

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Winner Claude Opus 4.7 80.8 65.6

Claude Opus 4.7 wins this comparison with an overall score of 81 vs 66 for Claude Opus 4.6, leading 5 of 7 shared benchmarks.

Anthropic · Generated: 23.09.2026

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-27B +7 more

Winner Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B 63.2 59.1 56.4 55.5 52.5 50.9 47.5 35.6 34 29.5

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B scores higher overall across category strength profiles (63 vs 59 for Qwen3.5-27B); only 0 benchmarks are directly comparable.

Qwen, Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud), Qwen Team (Alibaba) · Generated: 13.09.2026

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B +1 more

Winner Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 66.2 52.1 51.2 43.9

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins this comparison with an overall score of 66 vs 52 for Qwen3.5-27B, leading 11 of 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud), Qwen Team (Alibaba) · Generated: 13.09.2026

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 70.7 56.5 54

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 71 vs 56 for Qwen3.6-27B, leading 18 of 22 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 13.09.2026

Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Winner Qwen3.6-27B 88.3 65.8

Qwen3.6-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 88 vs 66 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 42 of 50 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 12.09.2026

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 87.4 56

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 87 vs 56 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, leading 30 of 32 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 10.09.2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Winner GLM-5.3 85.3 44 41.3

GLM-5.3 wins this comparison with an overall score of 85 vs 44 for GLM-5.3-Flash, leading 4 of 6 shared benchmarks.

Zhipu AI · Generated: 29.08.2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Winner GLM-5.3-Flash 85.4 54.7

GLM-5.3-Flash wins this comparison with an overall score of 85 vs 55 for GLM-5.2, leading 6 of 6 shared benchmarks.

Zhipu AI · Generated: 27.08.2026

Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Winner Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 89.4 63.2

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins this comparison with an overall score of 89 vs 63 for Qwen3.8-27B, leading 24 of 25 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud), Qwen Team (Alibaba) · Generated: 27.08.2026

Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B vs Gemma3-27B

Winner Qwen3.8-27B 83.8 53.7 7.6

Qwen3.8-27B wins this comparison with an overall score of 84 vs 54 for Qwen3.6-27B, leading 5 of 6 shared benchmarks.

Google, Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud) · Generated: 23.08.2026
Previous Page 1 of 2 Next