Claw-Eval Avg
Claw-Eval average score - agentic coding evaluation.
Category
Agentic Coding
Score type
percent
Scale
100%
higher is better
Models tested
25
What is Claw-Eval Avg?
Claw-Eval Avg is a benchmark for how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. The official description says: "Claw-Eval average score - agentic coding evaluation". Below we describe in simple words what benchmarks of this type generally examine.
What does it test?
Claw-Eval Avg measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. In detail, it checks:
- fixing real, open bugs from real software repositories
- planning multi-step changes, running commands and editing files by itself
- passing the project's test suite after its changes
- handling whole repositories, not just small isolated code snippets
How to read the score
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better.
Official methodology note: Claw-Eval average score - agentic coding evaluation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Claw-Eval Avg benchmark?
Claw-Eval Avg is a benchmark for how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. The official description says: 'Claw-Eval average score - agentic coding evaluation'. Below we describe in simple words what benchmarks of this type generally examine.
What does Claw-Eval Avg test?
Claw-Eval Avg mainly measures how well a model works as an autonomous coding agent. Concretely, it checks: fixing real, open bugs from real software repositories; planning multi-step changes, running commands and editing files by itself; passing the project's test suite after its changes.
How is the Claw-Eval Avg score calculated?
The score is accuracy: the percentage of tasks answered or solved correctly. 100% means every task was solved perfectly; higher is better. The declared maximum score of this benchmark is 100.0.
Where do I get Claw-Eval Avg data and scores?
The official benchmark page/reference is linked on this page. Every score on Open LLM Radar is also available as open data: download the scores JSON (http://open-llm-radar-api:8000/api/v1/benchmarks/claw-eval-avg/scores) or pull it directly from the Open LLM Radar API with any HTTP client.
Benchmark data & downloads
Where to get, inspect and reuse the data behind this benchmark.
Model scores 25 models tested
| # | Model | Score | Date | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xing4.0-29B-A4B
China Telecom AI
|
76.55%
|
16.09.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 2 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
75.4%
|
23.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 3 |
MiniMax-M3
MiniMaxAI
|
74.5%
|
11.06.2026 | MiniMax-M3 official evaluation metadata | Verified |
| 4 |
Qwen3.6-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
72.4%
|
22.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 5 |
Ornith-1.0-35B
DeepReinforce AI
|
69.8%
|
25.06.2026 | DeepReinforce Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 6 |
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
68.7%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 7 |
LFM3-1.7B
LiquidAI
|
68.64%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 8 |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
65.4%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 9 |
Qwen3.5-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
64.3%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 10 |
Ornith-1.0-9B
DeepReinforce AI
|
63.1%
|
25.06.2026 | DeepReinforce Team (official model card) | Verified |
| 11 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
61.5%
|
11.06.2026 | MiniMax-M3 model card benchmark table | Unverified |
| 12 |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen Team (Alibaba)
|
60.4%
|
26.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 13 |
granite-4.2-3B
IBM
|
60%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 14 |
MiniCPM5-2B
OpenBMB
|
59.2%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 15 |
Gemma4-26B-A4B
Google
|
58.8%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 16 |
Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
56.9%
|
18.08.2026 | Report | Verified |
| 17 |
Qwen3.5-4B
Qwen
|
51.6%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 18 |
Gemma4-31B-it
Google
|
48.5%
|
16.04.2026 | Qwen Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 19 |
Gemma4-E4B
Google
|
37.9%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 20 |
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B
NVIDIA
|
33.7%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 21 |
Gemma4-12B
Google
|
32.5%
|
25.06.2026 | DeepReinforce Team (official model card - comparison) | Unverified |
| 22 |
Gemma4-E2B
Google
|
31.3%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 23 |
Qwen3.5-2B
Qwen Team (Alibaba Cloud)
|
25.5%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 24 |
LFM2.5-2.6B
LiquidAI
|
19.3%
|
— | Report | Verified |
| 25 |
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
LiquidAI
|
2.7%
|
— | Report | Verified |